$41.95 Million Verdict Against Walmart After In-Store Baseball Bat Attack
Won by Arash Law.
A Riverside County jury awarded Carlos and Rosalia Fernandez $41.95 million in June 2023 after a mentally ill man grabbed an unsecured baseball bat from the sporting goods aisle of a San Jacinto Walmart and beat the couple, leaving both with traumatic brain injuries.
What happened
On November 23, 2017, a man entered a Walmart store in San Jacinto, California, walked to the sporting goods section, and picked a baseball bat off the shelf. He then moved through the aisles and struck Carlos Fernandez and Rosalia Fernandez repeatedly in the head. Other shoppers intervened and restrained the attacker, who was later found incompetent to stand trial and institutionalized.
Carlos sustained a depressed skull fracture. Rosalia also suffered blunt-force head trauma. Both underwent extended rehabilitation. Walmart disputed the severity of the ongoing injuries; its retained neurologist testified during trial that neither victim had lasting serious problems and that both had fully recovered.
The lawsuit, filed in Riverside County Superior Court as Case No. RIC1904598, argued that Walmart created an unreasonably dangerous condition by displaying baseball bats in an open retail aisle at a location with a documented history of criminal incidents. The theory was that the attack was foreseeable and that the store failed to take adequate security measures.
Brian Beecher of the Law Office of Arash Khorsandi, PC, served as lead trial counsel alongside Benny Khorsandi. The trial ran more than two months. The jury reached its verdict on June 22, 2023, awarding $41.95 million in total damages. The jury apportioned 50 percent of liability to Walmart, with the resulting judgment against the company exceeding $30 million.
Walmart filed a notice of appeal on July 30, 2024, and two appeals were consolidated under Court of Appeal case numbers E082756 and E084385 in the Fourth Appellate District. As of the filing of amicus briefs in late 2025, that appeal remains pending and the trial verdict has not been reduced by any appellate ruling.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.UniCourt: Fernandez vs Walmart Inc, Case Docket (Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. RIC1904598)·Archived copy
- 2.U.S. Chamber of Commerce Coalition Amicus Brief: Fernandez v. Walmart Inc., Cal. Ct. App. Nos. E082756 and E084385·Archived copy
- 3.Trial Lawyers University: Cross-Exam Jujitsu: The Path to a $41.95M Verdict Against Walmart·Archived copy
- 4.Advocate Magazine: 'Is There a Different Way to Cross-Examine at Trial?' (January 2024)·Archived copy
- 5.Plaintiff Magazine: 'Is There a Different Way to Cross-Examine at Trial?'·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from Arash Law
All Arash Law proven verdicts →A Los Angeles County jury returned a $17,854,093.94 verdict in December 2024 after finding that Sheriff deputies controlling foot traffic during a large soccer-related street celebration gave hand signals that contradicted active traffic lights, causing a vehicle to strike two pedestrians in a crosswalk.
Related premises liability verdicts
Anapol Weiss shareholder Kristen Gibbons Feden helped secure $1.6 billion in default verdicts for 104 women sexually abused as children by former Long Island pediatrician Stuart Copperman, one of the largest cumulative civil awards against a single individual in U.S. history.
A Dallas jury awarded $1.1 billion against a trust fund heir who beat a 2-year-old into a permanent vegetative state in 2021, a verdict the firm calls the largest child-assault award in U.S. history.
A Clayton County jury awarded $1 billion to a woman who was raped at age 14 by an armed security guard her employer hired without verifying he was licensed to carry a weapon.
Joseph Bruno and Bruno & Bruno served as lead plaintiffs' counsel in a landmark class action brought by more than 8,000 Gentilly residents exposed to a butadiene tank-car fire in 1987, securing a jury verdict that included $2.5 billion in punitive damages against CSX Transportation alone, later reduced to $850 million on appeal and affirmed by Louisiana's Fourth Circuit.