$1.38 millionVerdict

$1.38 Million Verdict for Woman Who Needed Back Surgery After a Rear-End Crash on the Job in Waterbury

Verdict · Connecticut Superior Court · 2009

After trial: The Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the verdict on November 22, 2011, and directed the trial court to grant Yeager's motion for offer-of-compromise interest, which does not count toward the ranked amount. The defendants' insurer paid its full policy limit, covering only part of the award, and a 2012 Appellate Court ruling reopened how that money was divided with her employer.

Won by D'Amico & Pettinicchi, LLC and Other counsel.

A Connecticut Superior Court jury awarded Donna Yeager $1,380,240 in June 2009 after a September 2006 rear-end collision in Waterbury, which happened while she was working, left her with back injuries that led to disc surgery. The Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the verdict in 2011. It also ruled that the trial court had wrongly struck her offer of compromise and sent the case back so that interest could be awarded.

What happened

On September 7, 2006, Donna Yeager was working for her employer, Priority Care, Inc., when a vehicle owned by Benito Alvarez's business and driven by Maria Alvarez struck her car from behind in Waterbury, Connecticut. Her injuries centered on her back.

She sued the Alvarezes and the businesses through which Benito Alvarez operated, Benny's Used Cars and Benny's Auto Repair, in April 2007, alleging serious and permanent injury and significant, possibly ongoing, medical expense. Priority Care, which was paying her workers' compensation benefits, joined the case to recover them. Her treatment did not go smoothly at first. One orthopedic surgeon told her in November 2006 that he could offer nothing for her neck or back, and a neurosurgeon concluded the next month that her condition was not suited to surgery. A third physician, neurosurgeon Abraham Mintz, took a different view. After recommending an epidural steroid injection, he said she was a candidate for plasma disc decompression in the lumbar spine, preceded by discography.

Yeager chose to go ahead. On August 29, 2007, an anesthesiologist trained in pain medicine performed the discography, and Mintz performed the plasma disc decompression the same day. She reported a hard recovery with a lot of low back pain, followed by slow improvement.

The case was tried to a Connecticut Superior Court jury, which returned its verdict on June 4, 2009. It found for Yeager and awarded her $1,380,240: $396,242 in economic damages and $983,998 in noneconomic damages. Michael D'Amico was her attorney in the trial court, as the Appellate Court's 2012 opinion records. On appeal, Wesley W. Horton argued for her with Karen L. Dowd, and D'Amico and Brendon P. Levesque were also on the brief.

A fight over interest followed the verdict. Under Connecticut's offer-of-compromise statute, a plaintiff who makes a written offer that the defendant does not accept within thirty days, and who then recovers at least that sum at trial, is entitled to eight percent annual interest on the award. Yeager had made such an offer in December 2007, and the verdict exceeded it. The defendants, however, had moved before trial to strike the offer. They argued she should have updated a discovery answer to disclose the August 2007 surgery sooner. The trial court agreed, struck the offer, and then denied her post-verdict motion for interest.

Yeager appealed, and the case moved to the Connecticut Supreme Court. In a decision issued November 22, 2011, the court held that trial judges do have the power to strike an offer of compromise as a discovery sanction, but that doing so here was an abuse of discretion. It noted that defense counsel conceded there was no bad faith, that the trial court made no finding of actual prejudice to the defendants, and that the bills and reports Yeager had turned over would have led a careful reader to the surgery. The court also pointed out that the defendants waited more than seven months after the surgical report was unambiguously disclosed before they moved. The justices reversed the order striking the offer and the denial of interest, remanded with direction to grant Yeager's motion, and affirmed the judgment in every other respect.

A second appeal concerned the money itself. After the verdict, the defendants' insurer paid the full limit of its policy, which covered only part of the award. Priority Care sought reimbursement from those funds, and in 2010 the trial court gave it most of what remained after her attorney's fee, without deducting further expenses Yeager said she had incurred to win the case. On March 6, 2012, the Connecticut Appellate Court reversed, holding that the reasonable and necessary expenditures an injured employee may deduct before the employer is repaid are not limited to the costs taxed in a bill of costs, and sent the matter back. Neither appeal disturbed the $1,380,240 verdict.

Sources

This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.

More proven verdicts from D'Amico & Pettinicchi, LLC

All D'Amico & Pettinicchi, LLC proven verdicts →
$40.5 millionVerdictReduced from $45 millionMotorcycle AccidentsCT

A Waterbury jury awarded Don Zemo IV $45 million after finding that a tow truck illegally parked outside MyHoopty.com's Oakville lot blocked the sightline for a car pulling out, causing a collision that left him permanently paralyzed.

2025 · Superior Court at Waterbury, Connecticut (UWY-CV22-6064639-S)Read the full story →
$23.05 millionVerdictCar AccidentsCT

A Waterbury jury awarded $23.05 million to a Wolcott boy who suffered permanent traumatic brain damage when the school bus he was riding, carrying students with disabilities, struck a tree after its driver swerved to avoid an oncoming car.

2019 · Superior Court at Waterbury, Connecticut (UWY-cv-15-6028864)Read the full story →

Related car accident verdicts

$301.04 billionVerdictNot collectableTX

On December 7, 2021, a Nueces County jury in Corpus Christi returned $1.04 billion in actual damages and $300 billion in exemplary damages, about $301.04 billion in total, against Beer Belly's Sports Bar and its owner for overserving a driver who killed Tamra Kay Kindred, 59, and her 16-year-old granddaughter in a 2017 crash. It was reported as the largest jury verdict ever recorded, and it was built to be symbolic: the bar had closed in 2019, Texas does not require bars to carry liquor liability insurance, and the family and its lawyers said openly that they expected to recover nothing and sought the number as a public statement against drunk driving. John Flood of Flood Trial Lawyers was lead counsel, with Sico, Hoelscher & Harris LLP as co-counsel; Craig Sico delivered the closing argument that asked jurors to decide how loudly their voice would be heard.

Sico Hoelscher Harris LLP2021 · Nueces County District Court, Corpus Christi, TXRead the full story →
$896.5 millionVerdictOn appealMI

An Oakland County jury awarded $896.5 million to a young boy who was struck by a prototype test car during a student field trip at a Continental test track, reported as the largest verdict in Michigan history. The award is pre-appeal: post-trial motions are pending, Continental never made a settlement offer, and the amount could still be reduced.

Marko Law Firm and Scott Goodwin Law P.C.2026 · Oakland County Circuit Court, MichiganRead the full story →
$831 millionVerdictTX

A Bexar County jury awarded roughly $831 million to Blas Mendez Jr., a longtime Seguin ISD special education behavior specialist left partially paralyzed after his motorcycle hit wreckage left in the road by an 18-year-old drunk driver who had been served at Koozies Icehouse & Grill in New Braunfels. Todd A. Hunter of Hunter Trial Law tried the dram shop case with E. Chevo Pastrano and Ginna G. Pastrano of The Pastrano Law Firm. The award was reported as the largest verdict ever returned by a San Antonio jury, and the bar had already closed by the time it came in, so the family is not expected to collect most, if any, of it.

Hunter Trial Law2025 · Bexar County District Court (San Antonio, TX)Read the full story →
$557 millionVerdictReversed on appealTX

A Harris County jury awarded Mary Johnson $557 million against Union Pacific for a 2016 Houston train strike that cost her a leg, several fingers, and left her with a brain injury, a figure the trial court later cut and an appeals court reversed for a new trial.

Arnold & Itkin2023 · Harris County District Court, Houston, TXRead the full story →