About Matthew Provencher

Attorney Matthew D. Provencher is pleased to return to DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry & Revens, Ltd. Previously an associate with the firm, Matt returned in 2026 as an attorney, bringing over a decade of experience in Rhode Island and Massachusetts courts. Matt earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and Sociology from the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 2011. He was admitted to the Roger Williams University School of Law, from which he received his Juris Doctor upon graduating magna cum laude in 2015. During his time in law school, Matt served as an editor on the Roger Williams University Law Review and was a member of the Moot Court Board.

A practicing attorney since 2015, Matt proudly represents clients in both state and federal courts. He got his start as a law clerk supporting the Justices of the Rhode Island Superior Court in Warwick, then moved into a similar role at the Massachusetts Superior Court in Boston. Following his clerkship, Matt joined DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry & Revens, Ltd., as an associate representing plaintiffs harmed due to medical malpractice, catastrophic injury accidents, and defective and dangerous products. He has also engaged in public interest litigation representing plaintiffs in civil rights actions arising from unlawful arrests, use of excessive force, and other constitutional violations, and has experience representing Massachusetts municipalities and private individuals in affordable housing development matters.

In recognition of his work on behalf of the injured, Matt was named a Rising Star by Super Lawyers every year from 2019 to 2025. Matt is a member of the Rhode Island Bar Association, the Rhode Island Association for Justice, and the New Bedford Bar Association. He is admitted to the bar in both Rhode Island and Massachusetts, as well as to the United States District Courts for the Districts of Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

Proven verdicts and settlements at DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry & Revens, Ltd.

These results are credited to DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry & Revens, Ltd.. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$7.29 million

A federal judge in Rhode Island found that a federally funded Providence health center spent nearly seven years calling a mother of four's headaches migraines before a brain tumor was found, and on December 9, 2024 entered judgment of $11,885,494.62 under the Federal Tort Claims Act, $8,385,494.62 of it to the injured woman and $3,500,000 to her four children. The tumor turned up only after she lost consciousness in the clinic's parking lot in 2019, and she suffered strokes during the surgery to remove it. The United States appealed. On March 27, 2026 the First Circuit affirmed her pain-and-suffering awards, modified her medical expense award down by $3,600, reversed the children's loss-of-consortium damages for lack of jurisdiction, and vacated the homemaker-damages award for recalculation. As of publication $7,286,894.62 stands confirmed, with the homemaker figure still open on remand.

U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island (Providence) · 2024Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Roger Williams University School of Law
J.D., 2015
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Undergraduate, 2011

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Rhode Island
State Bar of Massachusetts

Other attorneys at DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry & Revens, Ltd.

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Providence firms

Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP
Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP
Estate of Veteran With Schizophrenia Wins Social Security Benefits Back to 1975 After Appeals Reversal
Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, Accident & Injury Lawyers, Ltd.
Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, Accident & Injury Lawyers, Ltd.
$2 million · Quadriplegic Man Secures $2 Million Settlement After Fall on Newport's Cliff Walk

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.