Jury Awards $3.29 Million After Box Truck Rear-Ends Stopped Motorist at Sacramento Red Light
After trial: In November 2024 the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the $993,083 past medical and $685,993 future medical awards and ordered a new trial limited to those damages, and vacated the costs and prejudgment interest; the rest of the $3,299,455 verdict, $1,620,379, was affirmed. We could not find the outcome of the retrial.
A Sacramento jury returned a $3,299,455 verdict for a motorist whose spinal injuries from a 2015 rear-end collision left him permanently disabled, despite the defense contesting both causation and the claimed damages.
What happened
On June 16, 2015, David Yaffee was sitting in his Acura at a red light in Sacramento when a 26-foot box truck operated by Joseph Skeen, driving on behalf of his employer KLS Transportation, Inc., struck his vehicle from behind. The impact was low-speed, a fact the defense would lean on heavily at trial.
Yaffee felt immediate burning in his back and neck, along with tingling down his right leg. An MRI confirmed a disc herniation at L5-S1. What followed was years of escalating treatment: a microdiscectomy in September 2015, multiple fusion surgeries, a revision procedure to remove scar tissue, and ultimately a spinal cord stimulator. His treating physicians placed him on full medical disability in May 2021, finding him unable to return to work.
The case reached trial in Sacramento County Superior Court in the fall of 2022, more than seven years after the crash. John Demas and Brad Schultz of Demas Law Group, P.C. represented Yaffee. The defense disputed that the relatively minor impact could have caused the cascade of spinal problems Yaffee suffered, and challenged whether the long course of treatment and future care costs were legitimate. Judge James Arguelles presided over the nine-day trial.
The jury rejected the defense arguments. After two days of deliberation, it returned a verdict of $3,299,455, allocated across past and future medical expenses, lost past and future earnings, lost retirement benefits, and pain and suffering. The trial court subsequently added costs and prejudgment interest of roughly $1.65 million. Defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial; both were denied.
The defense appealed, and in December 2024 the California Court of Appeal, Third District, issued a mixed ruling. The awards for past and future lost earnings and future noneconomic damages, totaling approximately $2.12 million, were affirmed. The court reversed the medical-expense portions of the verdict, finding issues with how the trial court had applied the Hospital Lien Act to past medical costs and concluding the evidence did not sufficiently support a permanent dorsal root ganglion stimulator listed among future expenses. Those medical-damages components were remanded for a new trial limited to that issue. The affirmed awards for lost income and pain and suffering remained in place.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from Demas Law Group, P.C., Personal Injury Attorneys
All Demas Law Group, P.C., Personal Injury Attorneys proven verdicts →A Sacramento County jury awarded $32.16 million to the two young children of Juan Carlos Rodriguez after a City of Sacramento police detective drifted across the fog line on Interstate 5 and struck Rodriguez and his brother, killing both men.
A Sacramento family received a then-record $9.75 million civil settlement after a Sacramento police officer's department vehicle rear-ended their car at 63 mph on Interstate 80, fatally injuring 9-month-old Raiden Saechao.
Related car accident verdicts
On December 7, 2021, a Nueces County jury in Corpus Christi returned $1.04 billion in actual damages and $300 billion in exemplary damages, about $301.04 billion in total, against Beer Belly's Sports Bar and its owner for overserving a driver who killed Tamra Kay Kindred, 59, and her 16-year-old granddaughter in a 2017 crash. It was reported as the largest jury verdict ever recorded, and it was built to be symbolic: the bar had closed in 2019, Texas does not require bars to carry liquor liability insurance, and the family and its lawyers said openly that they expected to recover nothing and sought the number as a public statement against drunk driving. John Flood of Flood Trial Lawyers was lead counsel, with Sico, Hoelscher & Harris LLP as co-counsel; Craig Sico delivered the closing argument that asked jurors to decide how loudly their voice would be heard.
An Oakland County jury awarded $896.5 million to a young boy who was struck by a prototype test car during a student field trip at a Continental test track, reported as the largest verdict in Michigan history. The award is pre-appeal: post-trial motions are pending, Continental never made a settlement offer, and the amount could still be reduced.
A Bexar County jury awarded roughly $831 million to Blas Mendez Jr., a longtime Seguin ISD special education behavior specialist left partially paralyzed after his motorcycle hit wreckage left in the road by an 18-year-old drunk driver who had been served at Koozies Icehouse & Grill in New Braunfels. Todd A. Hunter of Hunter Trial Law tried the dram shop case with E. Chevo Pastrano and Ginna G. Pastrano of The Pastrano Law Firm. The award was reported as the largest verdict ever returned by a San Antonio jury, and the bar had already closed by the time it came in, so the family is not expected to collect most, if any, of it.
A Harris County jury awarded Mary Johnson $557 million against Union Pacific for a 2016 Houston train strike that cost her a leg, several fingers, and left her with a brain injury, a figure the trial court later cut and an appeals court reversed for a new trial.