Guess Umbrella Injures Worker; Indiana Supreme Court Rules Trademark Licensors Can Face Negligence Claims
Won by Hovde Dassow + Deets.
Frederick R. Hovde secured a 2004 Indiana Supreme Court ruling holding that companies licensing their trademarks for use on consumer products may be held liable in negligence when those products cause injury.
What happened
In November 1996, Kaye Kennedy bought a Guess-branded watch at a Lazarus department store in Indianapolis. The store threw in a free promotional umbrella also bearing the Guess logo. Neither she nor her husband Richard had any reason to suspect the gift would cause harm.
On May 22, 1998, Richard brought the umbrella to work. A coworker picked it up and started swinging it. The shaft separated from the handle, flew through the air, and struck Richard in the nose and sinus area. The impact left him with a facial injury that became the center of a product liability lawsuit.
The Kennedys, represented by Frederick R. Hovde of the Hovde Law Firm in Indianapolis, sued Guess, Inc., distributor Callanen International, and the Hong Kong-based manufacturer under both strict product liability and negligence theories. Guess moved for summary judgment, arguing its sole connection to the umbrella was a trademark license and that it never designed, made, or distributed the product.
The trial court agreed and dismissed both claims. Hovde appealed, and in 2002 the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed, finding genuine factual disputes on both theories. Guess sought transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court.
In its April 2004 decision, 806 N.E.2d 776, the Supreme Court addressed a question Indiana courts had not previously resolved: whether a trademark licensor can face liability under the Indiana Product Liability Act. The court held that Guess did not qualify as a seller in the distribution chain for purposes of strict liability, because its only role was licensing the mark. On negligence, however, the court ruled that trademark licensors are not automatically shielded. A company that puts its name on a product and derives commercial benefit from that association may owe a duty of care proportionate to its actual involvement in the product's design, manufacture, or distribution. The case was remanded for further proceedings on the negligence claim.
The ruling gave Indiana courts a framework for evaluating brand-licensor liability in product injury cases, a question that had divided courts in other states for years. It established that the commercial shelter of a pure licensing arrangement does not, by itself, extinguish a duty to consumers harmed by products bearing the licensed mark.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from Hovde Dassow + Deets
All Hovde Dassow + Deets proven verdicts →In early 2014, Biomet agreed to pay at least $56 million to settle about 1,000 federal lawsuits over its M2a 38 and M2a Magnum metal-on-metal hip implants, consolidated in the Northern District of Indiana. Qualifying patients who had the device revised received a base award of $200,000, adjusted by individual factors. Thomas Anapol was court-appointed Co-Lead Counsel with W. Mark Lanier and signed the agreement for the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. The figure covers many unrelated plaintiffs, is a reported minimum rather than a final total, and is not itemized by person.
A Morgan County jury awarded $1,250,075 to a plumbing contractor who suffered severe burns after a Carmel High School maintenance employee ignited a pool heater's pilot light over the contractor's explicit objection, triggering a gas explosion that blew the roof off the building.
A jury found an Indiana obstetrician liable for a permanent brachial plexus injury to a newborn's left arm during a forceps delivery in 1989. The jury awarded $400,000. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in May 2001, rejecting challenges to jury instructions, discovery rulings, evidence and the causation finding.
A 13-year-old boy was electrocuted and killed while swimming at a home leased in a mobile home park in Indiana in July 2010. After a three-day trial, a jury found his parents' total damages were $3,000,000 and put 5 percent of the fault on the park, producing a $150,000 verdict. The trial court then added attorney's fees and litigation expenses under Indiana's Child Wrongful Death Statute, and the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed that award in 2017.
Related product liability verdicts
Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.
C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.
As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.
After fifteen years of litigation and three failed bankruptcy maneuvers by Johnson and Johnson subsidiaries, Ashcraft and Gerel attorneys R. Bryant McCulley and Michelle Parfitt helped negotiate a global, uncapped settlement of at least $5.5 billion covering approximately 76,000 ovarian-cancer claims.