San Antonio Jury Awards Over $1 Million After Parking Lot Collision, Later Reversed on Appeal
After trial: The Fourth Court of Appeals reversed the judgment on April 29, 2026 and sent the case back for a new trial, holding the trial court should have let the jury weigh whether Steele bore any share of fault for the crash rather than removing that question by directed verdict. Because it resolved the appeal on that single point, the court expressly declined to reach the appellants' remaining issues, which included challenges to the exclusion of medical billing evidence and to the sufficiency of the future medical and noneconomic damages awards, so those attacks on the verdict were never decided. The appeal did not contest the separate award to Sierrah Walters. Both sides filed motions for rehearing on May 13, 2026 and further briefing was filed on June 16, 2026, and the court has not yet ruled. Because the reversal is not final, the $1,052,500 verdict does not currently stand, no retrial has occurred, and there is no public record of any payment.
Won by Joe A. Gamez Law Firm.
A Bexar County jury awarded Brenda Steele $1,052,500 after finding a Martin Marietta employee responsible for a 2018 collision in a Walmart parking lot that left Steele needing years of spine treatment. Her adult daughter, a passenger in the car, received a separate and far smaller award for her own injuries. The trial court had removed the question of Steele's own possible fault from the jury by directed verdict before the case went to the jury. In April 2026, the Fourth Court of Appeals reversed that ruling and sent the case back for a new trial, holding the jury should have decided whether Steele shared any responsibility for the crash. Motions for rehearing are pending, so the reversal is not yet final and the verdict does not currently stand.
What happened
In late August 2018, Brenda Steele and her adult daughter Sierrah Walters were driving through a Walmart parking lot in San Antonio on their way to buy groceries for a family dinner. The lot's access road curved and had no painted center line. As Steele's car and an oncoming pickup driven by Eric Garcia, an employee of Martin Marietta Materials Southwest, passed one another, the two vehicles made contact and the taillight on Steele's car was broken.
Steele's back and neck problems worsened steadily after the crash. In the years that followed she underwent a lumbar laminectomy and discectomy performed by Dr. Michael Leonard. By the time her case went to trial in March 2024, she was scheduled for a lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 and a later cervical discectomy and artificial disc replacement at C5-C6, both to be performed by orthopedic spine surgeon Dr. Frank Kuwamura. She testified to daily pain she rated at four or five out of ten, sometimes higher, wore a TENS unit during trial, carried a handicap placard, and had stepped back from client work as a realtor into a broker role. Her husband, her son, her daughter, and a neighbor described her giving up hiking, cycling, and volunteering with her children's ROTC unit.
The case went to trial in the 37th Judicial District Court in Bexar County before Judge Nicole Garza. Garcia testified repeatedly that he had stayed in his own lane, which carried the implication that Steele had not stayed in hers. Steele's side pointed to a photograph she took of the debris at the scene, including pieces of her broken taillight, and argued it placed the contact on her side of the road. At the close of evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict removing the question of Steele's own possible fault from the jury altogether.
On March 25, 2024, the jury found Garcia and Martin Marietta negligent and awarded Steele $1,052,500 by a vote of 10 to 2: $575,000 for future medical care, $225,000 combined for past and future pain and suffering, $125,000 combined for past and future mental anguish, $120,000 combined for past and future physical impairment, and $7,500 combined for past and future disfigurement. Walters, who was riding in the car, received a separate and far smaller award for her own past pain, mental anguish, and impairment. The trial court signed judgment on the verdict on April 30, 2024.
Garcia and Martin Marietta appealed, and on April 29, 2026, the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio reversed the judgment and sent the case back for a new trial. The panel held that Garcia's testimony that he stayed in his own lane was more than a scintilla of evidence that Steele may have left hers, and that where the two drivers' accounts conflict, the jury rather than the judge has to weigh their credibility and answer the comparative negligence question.
Both sides filed motions for rehearing in May 2026, and further briefing followed in June. As of this writing, the Fourth Court of Appeals has not ruled on those motions, the reversal is not yet final, and the case has not been retried.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.Fourth Court of Appeals memorandum opinion, No. 04-24-00501-CV, delivered April 29, 2026 (court record): confirms the case style, trial court and judge, the collision setting, the directed verdict on Steele's contributory negligence, the holding that the question belonged to the jury, the reversal and remand for a new trial, and the court's decision not to reach the appellants' damages and evidentiary issues
- 2.Appellees' Brief, No. 04-24-00501-CV, filed 7/28/2025 (court record): Identity of Parties and Counsel names Anthony 'Tony' Garza-Vale of Gamez Law Firm as Steele's trial counsel; the Statement of Facts and the reproduced final judgment and jury charge give the collision date and location, Steele's injuries and surgeries, the March 18-25, 2024 trial dates, the 10-2 verdict, and the damage-by-damage breakdown of the $1,052,500 award
- 3.Texas Fourth Court of Appeals case docket, No. 04-24-00501-CV (court record): lists Anthony Garza-Vale among appellees' counsel of record, and confirms the trial court cause number, the opinion date and disposition, the motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed May 13, 2026, the June 16, 2026 filing, and that no ruling on rehearing has issued
- 4.TopVerdict.com, Top 50 Personal Injury Verdicts in Texas 2024: lists Steele et al. v. Garcia et al. at $1,064,500 (the combined Steele and Walters awards) with Anthony R. Garza-Vale of Gamez Law Firm as counsel (corroboration only, not independent by itself)
Related car accident verdicts
On December 7, 2021, a Nueces County jury in Corpus Christi returned $1.04 billion in actual damages and $300 billion in exemplary damages, about $301.04 billion in total, against Beer Belly's Sports Bar and its owner for overserving a driver who killed Tamra Kay Kindred, 59, and her 16-year-old granddaughter in a 2017 crash. It was reported as the largest jury verdict ever recorded, and the honest frame is that it was built to be symbolic: the bar had closed in 2019, Texas does not require bars to carry liquor liability insurance, and the family and its lawyers said openly that they expected to recover nothing and sought the number as a public statement against drunk driving. John Flood of Flood Trial Lawyers was lead counsel, with Sico, Hoelscher & Harris LLP as co-counsel; Craig Sico delivered the closing argument that asked jurors to decide how loudly their voice would be heard.
An Oakland County jury awarded $896.5 million to a young boy who was struck by a prototype test car during a student field trip at a Continental test track, reported as the largest verdict in Michigan history. The award is pre-appeal: post-trial motions are pending, Continental never made a settlement offer, and the amount could still be reduced.
A Bexar County jury awarded roughly $831 million to Blas Mendez Jr., a longtime Seguin ISD special education behavior specialist left partially paralyzed after his motorcycle hit wreckage left in the road by an 18-year-old drunk driver who had been served at Koozies Icehouse & Grill in New Braunfels. Todd A. Hunter of Hunter Trial Law tried the dram shop case with E. Chevo Pastrano and Ginna G. Pastrano of The Pastrano Law Firm. The honest frame: the award was reported as the largest verdict ever returned by a San Antonio jury, and the bar had already closed by the time it came in, so the family is not expected to collect most, if any, of it.