About Barry N. Covert

Barry N. Covert is a nationally recognized litigator with over thirty years of experience representing defendants in complex litigation matters before federal and state courts. Members of the legal community often refer cases to Mr. Covert for matters that involve White-Collar Criminal Defense, Violent Crime Defense, Zoning and Land Use Litigation, Professional Misconduct, Constitutional Law, Commercial Litigation, Cyber-Crimes, Title IX, Qui Tam Act, and Scientific Misconduct. The following are examples of Mr. Covert's extensive experience: Represented defendants in a wide spectrum of criminal matters including: white-collar charges, securities violations, drug conspiracies, Hobbs Act, homicides.

And RICO matters Represented defendants in Federal Court in complex criminal matters, including four federal death penalty eligible case Defended clients in civil and criminal litigation matters in New York State and Federal Courts Federal Court appearances, including the Southern District of New York, Western District of New York, and Eastern District of Virginia State Court appearances, including New York, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia Represented clients against various municipal governments in zoning and land use litigation matters including opposition to land use regulations, land use permitting, land development, land entitlement, rezoning, zoning law, zoning ordinances, and zoning variances.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria

These results are credited to Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$100 millionVerdictTop 20 in New York · #13

An Erie County jury awarded $100 million to a woman sexually abused over four years beginning at age 12, the largest Child Victims Act verdict in New York State history.

New York State Supreme Court, Erie County · 2023Read the full story →
$95 millionVerdictTop 20 in New York · #15

A Monroe County jury ordered former Rochester Catholic priest Foster Rogers to pay $95 million to a man he sexually assaulted in 1979, when the victim was 15 years old, in one of the largest Child Victims Act verdicts in New York history.

New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County · 2023Read the full story →
$65 millionVerdictTop 20 in New York · #20

An Erie County jury awarded $65 million to a woman who was sexually abused over seven years as a child by former Buffalo YMCA counselor James B. Jackson, in one of the largest verdicts under New York's Child Victims Act.

New York State Supreme Court, Erie County · 2022Read the full story →
$30 millionVerdict

An Erie County jury awarded $30 million to a man who was sexually abused as a child by Rev. Douglas D. Thore, a Lutheran pastor in Marilla, NY, in what was reported as the largest Child Victims Act verdict in Western New York at the time.

New York State Supreme Court, Erie County · 2022Read the full story →
$25 millionVerdict

An Erie County jury awarded $25 million to a man sexually abused by his Boy Scout troop leader in Cheektowaga during the early 1970s, in what presiding Judge Mark Grisanti described as the first jury verdict reached under New York's Child Victims Act.

New York State Supreme Court, Erie County · 2022Read the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Education

State University of New York at Buffalo
J.D., 1989
State University of New York at Fredonia
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of New York

Other attorneys at Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Buffalo firms

Cellino Law Injury Attorneys
Cellino Law Injury Attorneys
$19.45 million · $47.4 Million Verdict for Law Student Brain-Damaged in Thruway Road-Rage Crash
The Barnes Firm Injury Attorneys
The Barnes Firm Injury Attorneys
$19.45 million · $47.4 Million Verdict for Law Student Brain-Damaged in Thruway Road-Rage Crash

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.