First Circuit Strikes Down SSA Fee Rules, Forces Agency Rewrite
Won by Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP.
A three-judge First Circuit panel ruled that two Social Security Administration practices governing attorney fee payments were arbitrary and unenforceable, ordering the agency to revise procedures that had denied Marasco & Nesselbush roughly $70,000 in earned fees.
What happened
Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP, a Rhode Island firm that represents Social Security disability claimants, built a substantial caseload on contingency-style fee arrangements authorized under federal law. When clients win benefits, the SSA withholds a portion of past-due payments and forwards the approved fee directly to the attorney of record. That system worked until several M&N associates left the firm to take government jobs.
The SSA took the position that once a lawyer joined a federal agency, any fees tied to cases that associate had worked on were simply forfeited, even when the legal work was already complete and the fee had been earned before the attorney left. The agency also refused to pay fees directly to the law firm itself, insisting that payments could only flow to individual attorneys. The combined effect was that Marasco & Nesselbush was denied approximately $70,000 in fees it had legitimately earned.
The firm sued in federal district court, challenging both practices under the Administrative Procedure Act. After the district court dismissed most of the claims, the firm appealed. The case reached the First Circuit as No. 20-1397, with a panel consisting of Chief Judge Jeffrey R. Howard and Circuit Judges Kermit V. Lipez and O. Rogeriee Thompson.
In a July 16, 2021 opinion authored by Judge Lipez, the court agreed with Marasco & Nesselbush on the core APA claims. The panel found that the SSA's refusal to pay fees for work completed before an associate entered government service had no rational basis under federal ethics statutes and directly contradicted the statutory mandate to pay a reasonable fee. The court also found that the agency's blanket refusal to pay law firms directly, rather than individual attorneys, ignored the practical reality that firms are the actual recipients of fees paid to salaried associates. Both practices were declared arbitrary and unenforceable.
The First Circuit ordered the SSA to release the fees held in escrow, revisit previously denied fee requests for the three departing associates' work, and revise its procedures to provide a reliable mechanism for direct law firm payments. Bloomberg Law reported on the ruling the same day under the headline 'Law Firm Forces Rewrite of Social Security Attorneys' Fee Rules.' The SSA ultimately published a final rule on August 21, 2024, overhauling its claimant-representation regulations in direct response to the First Circuit's decision, citing Marasco & Nesselbush v. Collins as the basis for the changes.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP
All Marasco & Nesselbush, LLP proven verdicts →After more than three decades of denials, the First Circuit vacated the judgment against the claimant and, on remand, an SSA administrative law judge awarded retroactive Social Security disability benefits to the estate of a Rhode Island veteran whose untreated schizophrenia had gone uncompensated since 1975.
Related Massachusetts verdicts
The family of Greg Sharrigan, killed when a gas leak ignited at his Maynard home in September 2021, sued Eversource for $450 million, alleging the utility detected the underground leak three years before the fatal explosion and never fixed it.
A Suffolk County jury awarded $200 million in October 2023, the largest wrongful death award in Boston history, against R.J. Reynolds for the lung cancer death of Rita Jones, who first received free Newport cigarettes as a teenager in 1964.
After winning a $26.6 million jury verdict for a union mason who fell through defective scaffolding on the Longfellow Bridge, Andrew Abraham of Keches Law Group returned to court and proved that Liberty Mutual's insurers willfully refused to investigate or settle a clear liability case, prompting a judge to double the compensatory judgment to over $91 million under Chapter 93A and 176D.
Peter Merrigan of Sweeney Merrigan Personal Injury Lawyers represented 125 Massachusetts cities and towns in claims against Johnson and Johnson and the three largest opioid distributors, recovering $84.1 million in aggregate from the national opioid settlements.