About Marcie E. Greene
Marcie Greene is an attorney with McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC's mass tort and class action practice group. Ms. Greene joined McGowan Hood in 2024 following more than a decade of public service and complex legal research practice in both South Carolina and Tennessee. Her experience includes serving as Advice Counsel at the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, where she provided legal advice to state licensing boards, drafted administrative orders and regulations, and advised on policy and disciplinary matters. Previously.
She worked for seven years as a research attorney at Willoughby, Humphrey & D'Antoni, P.A., where she advised senior attorneys on litigation involving environmental law, administrative governance, and public entity matters under statutes such as the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the South Carolina Pollution Control Act. Ms. Greene also served as an Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Litigation Division of the South Carolina Attorney General's Office, where she represented state agencies in contested matters at both the trial and appellate levels.
Earlier in her career, she held a similar role in the Office of the Tennessee Attorney General and clerked for two trial court judges in Nashville. She earned her J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School, where she was named to the Dean's List and participated in Moot Court, Mock Trial, and the Trial Advocacy Society. She graduated magna cum laude from Clemson University's Calhoun Honors College with a degree in psychology and was the recipient of the Psi Chi Research Award for best research paper. She is admitted to practice in South Carolina and Tennessee.
Proven verdicts and settlements at McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC
These results are credited to McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A South Carolina family reached a confidential $40.35 million settlement, structured under a high-low agreement, after radiologists reading a newborn's early chest X-rays missed a ribcage deformity that turned out to be a sign of neuroblastoma, a childhood cancer that grew into the child's spinal canal and caused permanent paralysis before it was caught.
A Spartanburg County jury awarded Dara Robinson $16 million against Spartanburg & Pelham OBGYN and three of its physicians after they delayed a cesarean delivery for roughly 30 hours despite fetal monitoring showing signs of distress, and her son died shortly after birth.
Seletha Gartrell, 54, of Aiken, arrived at Aiken Regional Medical Centers on December 6, 2012 with severe sepsis and was not given the antibiotics her doctors ordered for roughly 14 hours; she went into septic shock, suffered a cardiac arrest, and lost both legs above the knee, her left arm below the elbow, and fingers on her right hand. In March 2017 an Aiken County jury found the hospital negligent and awarded her $13.75 million, made up of $10 million in economic damages and $3.75 million in non-economic damages. The hospital publicly disagreed with the verdict, and no appeal or later reduction appears in any public record we could find.
Vernon Sulton, paralyzed by gunshot wounds he suffered as a bystander to an armed robbery, was admitted to HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital in Columbia with a stage two pressure ulcer on his sacrum; in the 11 days he stayed there it deepened to stage four, requiring a colostomy and skin-graft surgery. A Richland County jury found the hospital and six of its nurses negligent, awarding $306,693.25 to his estate, $4 million to his wife for loss of consortium, and $8 million in punitive damages against HealthSouth. On November 21, 2012 the South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the entire verdict and ordered a new trial, holding that the trial judge had wrongly instructed the jury that the hospital owed a heightened duty of care. What happened after the remand is not in any public record we could find.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.