Sesame Place Sold the Shoes, Ignored the Ban: $676,736 Verdict for Waterslide Ankle Fracture
After trial: The jury put 32 percent of the fault on the visitor, so his $995,200 award was reduced to about $676,700.
Won by Reiff Law Firm.
A Philadelphia jury awarded $995,200 after finding Sesame Place 68 percent liable for a visitor's severe ankle fracture-dislocation caused by rubber aquatic shoes the park actively sold and never banned from its waterslide.
What happened
On May 30, 2011, Onix Agosto Jr., 21, visited Sesame Place in Langhorne, Pennsylvania with his family. He wore rubber aquatic shoes, the kind sold in the park's own gift shop and promoted on the Sesame Place website. Nothing at the ride entrance told him to take them off.
Agosto slid down the Bert and Ernie serpentine waterslide. About 24 feet in, he hit a right-hand turn. The rubber tread of his left shoe caught on the outer wall of the channel. His lower leg stopped; the rest of his body kept going. The result was an immediate, severe twisting injury: a comminuted bimalleolar fracture-dislocation of the left ankle.
The injury required open reduction and internal fixation, with a plate and multiple screws placed to stabilize the joint. Agosto then completed more than 130 physical therapy sessions. In February 2012 surgeons removed three of the screws. A year after that, a third operation addressed osteochondral damage that had developed in the ankle joint.
Robert T. Szostak of Reiff and Bily (now The Reiff Law Firm) argued that Sesame Place created the hazard through its own conduct. The park sold rubber aquatic shoes on the premises and recommended them on its website, yet those shoes are precisely the footwear that ASTM standards on amusement rides and waterslide systems require parks to ban from slides. An amusement-park safety expert testified that rubber soles act as a brake on a waterslide, altering the friction dynamics in ways that dramatically increase the chance of a catch-and-twist injury. The park's own employee training materials, drawn from the American Red Cross Lifeguarding Manual, stated that aqua socks and aqua shoes are prohibited on waterslides. The rule existed; Sesame Place simply did not enforce or post it.
The defense argued that Agosto bore responsibility for wearing the shoes. The jury agreed in part, apportioning 32 percent of fault to him. The remaining 68 percent went to Sesame Place and its parent, SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment LLC. On a gross verdict of $995,200, that division reduces the recoverable damages to approximately $676,700, consistent with news coverage at the time that placed the net award at nearly $700,000.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
Related premises liability verdicts
Anapol Weiss shareholder Kristen Gibbons Feden helped secure $1.6 billion in default verdicts for 104 women sexually abused as children by former Long Island pediatrician Stuart Copperman, one of the largest cumulative civil awards against a single individual in U.S. history.
A Dallas jury awarded $1.1 billion against a trust fund heir who beat a 2-year-old into a permanent vegetative state in 2021, a verdict the firm calls the largest child-assault award in U.S. history.
A Clayton County jury awarded $1 billion to a woman who was raped at age 14 by an armed security guard her employer hired without verifying he was licensed to carry a weapon.
Joseph Bruno and Bruno & Bruno served as lead plaintiffs' counsel in a landmark class action brought by more than 8,000 Gentilly residents exposed to a butadiene tank-car fire in 1987, securing a jury verdict that included $2.5 billion in punitive damages against CSX Transportation alone, later reduced to $850 million on appeal and affirmed by Louisiana's Fourth Circuit.