Quadriplegia After Subaru Roof Collapse: $6.5 Million Verdict
After trial: Affirmed in full by the 10th Circuit; no remittitur.
Won by Shamberg Johnson & Bergman.
A Kansas jury awarded $6.5 million after finding Subaru liable for a roof crush defect that left a young man a quadriplegic in a rollover crash, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed the full judgment in a published 1996 opinion.
What happened
On the night of February 19, 1988, a group of teenagers were driving a 1982 Subaru GL Station Wagon along U.S. Highway 83 in Kansas when one occupant grabbed the steering wheel. The driver lost control. The wagon skidded into a ditch and rolled twice. Steven Compton, who was riding unbelted in the rear seat, suffered a catastrophic spinal cord injury during the first roll and was left a quadriplegic.
Compton sued Subaru of America and its Japanese parent, Fuji Heavy Industries, arguing that the car's roof was defective. His claim was not that Subaru caused the rollover, but that the vehicle failed to protect its occupants once the rollover began. Evidence at trial showed that the roof and side of the passenger compartment intruded excessively during the crash, collapsing inward onto Compton's head in a way a properly designed structure should have resisted.
Shamberg, Johnson and Bergman attorney Lynn R. Johnson led the plaintiff team at trial. The defense challenged the admissibility of the plaintiff's engineering expert, arguing his opinions failed the reliability standards the Supreme Court had set out in Daubert v. Merrell Dow. The district court admitted the testimony, and the jury found Subaru 56 percent at fault for Compton's injuries.
After apportioning fault, the court entered judgment against Subaru and Fuji in the amount of $6,574,081. Subaru appealed to the Tenth Circuit, pressing both the Daubert issue and a sufficiency-of-evidence argument under Kansas law. The appellate court rejected both. On the expert question, the panel held that Daubert's methodology-focused factors do not apply to testimony grounded in engineering experience and observation rather than a specific scientific method. On the merits, the court found the trial record contained sufficient evidence of specific design defects to support the verdict.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the full judgment in a published opinion, Compton v. Subaru of America, Inc., 82 F.3d 1513 (10th Cir. 1996). No remittitur was ordered. The decision became a notable Tenth Circuit reference on the scope of Daubert in product-liability cases involving experience-based expert witnesses.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from Shamberg Johnson & Bergman
All Shamberg Johnson & Bergman proven verdicts →A federal jury in Wichita awarded $23.5 million to a Yellow Freight co-driver left with debilitating injuries after a Swift Transportation driver, impaired by methamphetamine, backed her rig from a rest stop onto U.S. Highway 54 in New Mexico.
After United States Aircraft Insurance Group sat on a $100,000 voluntary-settlement offer for more than a year following a fatal 2013 Kansas plane crash, a Riley County judge held the insurer responsible for the entire $11.5 million wrongful-death judgment entered against its insured.
A Johnson County jury awarded $5.7 million to the family of Kim Yates, a 49-year-old woman who died by suicide three days after AdventHealth Shawnee Mission discharged her despite an initial triage assessment flagging her as high risk, in what records show is the largest wrongful death or medical malpractice verdict in Johnson County history.
A Johnson County jury returned the largest medical-malpractice verdict in the county in more than 25 years after finding a pain clinic and its physician responsible for a spinal MRSA infection that destroyed a patient's quality of life.
Related product liability verdicts
Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.
C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.
As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.
After fifteen years of litigation and three failed bankruptcy maneuvers by Johnson and Johnson subsidiaries, Ashcraft and Gerel attorneys R. Bryant McCulley and Michelle Parfitt helped negotiate a global, uncapped settlement of at least $5.5 billion covering approximately 76,000 ovarian-cancer claims.