Similar personal injury attorneys in Little Rock
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Kenneth Mitchell
Kenneth "Rusty" Mitchell is a native of Bauxite, Arkansas who joined the Taylor King Law team in 2013 and practices in the Little Rock office. He earned a Bachelor of Arts from Ouachita Baptist University in Arkadelphia and a Juris Doctor from William H. Bowen School of Law in Little Rock. Rusty has been recognized as a Rising Star by Mid-South Super Lawyers, appeared on Little Rock Soiree Magazine's Best Lawyers list in 2020, and is listed in Super Lawyers' Rising Stars. He is a member of the Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association and serves as a board member of Family Home of Little Rock and a volunteer at Family Promise. Outside of work, Rusty enjoys golf, hunting, and fishing.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Taylor King Law
These results are credited to Taylor King Law. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Pulaski County jury awarded a 53-year-old woman $600,000 after finding a North Little Rock massage therapist and the spa that employed him liable for sexually assaulting her during a June 2024 appointment. Jurors held massage therapist Nikkolas Lee Huerta liable for $500,000 and Trinity Massage LLC liable for a separate $100,000 for negligent hiring and training. The woman had testified that the stress of the attack forced her to give up a 17-year nursing career. Circuit Judge Shawn Johnson presided over the one-day trial in Pulaski County Circuit Court, and the 12-member jury was unanimous even though Arkansas civil verdicts require only nine jurors to agree. No appeal of the civil judgment has been reported.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Taylor King Law
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Little Rock firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









