Los Angeles Jury Finds Meta and YouTube Liable for Addictive Design That Harmed a Young Woman
After trial: Judge Kuhl denied Meta's and Google's motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial in June 2026, leaving the full $6 million intact. Both companies have appealed, and we found no appellate ruling.
Won by The Lanier Law Firm.
A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google's YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young woman identified as K.G.M., who began watching YouTube at age 6 and joined Instagram at 9. On March 25, 2026, it awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, split 70 percent to Meta and 30 percent to YouTube, plus $3 million in punitive damages. It was the first bellwether trial in the coordinated California social media addiction cases.
What happened
On March 25, 2026, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury returned the first verdict in the coordinated social media addiction litigation, finding Meta Platforms and Google's YouTube liable for harm to a young woman known in court by the initials K.G.M. The jury awarded $6 million in total: $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages. Judge Carolyn Kuhl presided over the case, the first bellwether in JCCP 5255.
K.G.M., now 20, started watching YouTube at age 6 and joined Instagram at 9. She testified that she used the platforms all day, every day, and that she could not be without them. She described depression, anxiety and body dysmorphia. Instagram's beauty filters, she said, reinforced a negative image of herself, and bullying online deepened her compulsive use.
Her claim was not about any particular post or video. It targeted how the products were built: design features meant to draw young users in and keep them there. W. Mark Lanier of The Lanier Law Firm tried the case for the plaintiff, with Rachel Lanier and Sarah Lanier beside him at counsel table. Paul Schmidt appeared for Meta and Luis Li for Google.
The defense put the blame elsewhere. Meta argued that K.G.M.'s difficulties came from family problems and learning disabilities rather than from Instagram. Google said her YouTube use peaked around age 8 and that the service was not addictive, telling jurors it had not rewired her brain.
After more than eight days of deliberation, the jury sided with the plaintiff. It found both companies negligent in the design and operation of their platforms and assigned 70 percent of the $3 million compensatory award to Meta and 30 percent to YouTube. It also found that the companies acted with malice or fraud, and set punitive damages at $2.1 million for Meta and $900,000 for Google.
Meta and Google asked the court to set the verdict aside or order a new trial. Judge Kuhl denied both motions in a written ruling in June 2026. She rejected the argument that the First Amendment or Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shielded the companies, finding substantial evidence that K.G.M.'s harms flowed from the design of the platforms rather than from content. Both companies said they would appeal.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.Courthouse News Service, 'Meta and Google hit with verdict for social media harms to young woman', March 2026·Archived copy
- 2.The Texas Lawbook, 'Lanier Firm Gets Win in Meta, Google Social Media Addiction Trial', March 25, 2026·Archived copy
- 3.Houston Chronicle, Lisa Falkenberg, 'For renowned Houston lawyer Mark Lanier, beating Meta and Google was a family affair', April 9, 2026·Archived copy
- 4.MediaPost, 'Judge Rejects Meta And Google Bid To Overturn Addiction Verdict', June 2026·Archived copy
- 5.MDL Update, 'JCCP 5255 Social Media Cases: K.G.M. $6M Verdict & Status'·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from The Lanier Law Firm
All The Lanier Law Firm proven verdicts →A St. Louis jury in July 2018 awarded 22 women and their families $4.69 billion, the largest U.S. verdict of that year, finding that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer; a Missouri appellate court upheld $2.11 billion in 2020.
After a six-week federal trial, a jury found three of the nation's largest retail pharmacy chains created a public nuisance by flooding Lake and Trumbull Counties, Ohio with opioid pills, and a judge ordered $650 million to fund a 15-year abatement plan.
A Dallas federal jury awarded $1.04 billion to six California patients harmed by Johnson and Johnson's metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip implants, with W. Mark Lanier leading an eight-week trial that produced one of the largest product-liability verdicts of 2016.
Hours before opening arguments in the first federal opioid bellwether trial, W. Mark Lanier and co-counsel secured a $260 million settlement from distributors AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson, plus manufacturer Teva, on behalf of Cuyahoga and Summit counties in Ohio.
Related product liability verdicts
Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.
Wayne Hogan served on the private-counsel team that secured a then-record $11.3 billion settlement from five major cigarette manufacturers, reimbursing Florida's Medicaid program for decades of smoking-related medical costs.
C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.
As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.