HomeCaliforniaLos AngelesWisner Baum LLPProven verdicts$56,005,830 judgment after remittitur (about $11.2 million compensatory plus about $44.8 million punitive; jury awarded $37.2 million compensatory plus $1 billion punitive to Alberta Pilliod; her husband Alva's award is a separate row)
$56,005,830 judgment after remittitur (about $11.2 million compensatory plus about $44.8 million punitive; jury awarded $37.2 million compensatory plus $1 billion punitive to Alberta Pilliod; her husband Alva's award is a separate row)VerdictReduced from $1.04 billionPaid

Livermore Retiree Whose Lymphoma Spread to Her Brain Holds a $56 Million Roundup Judgment Through the U.S. Supreme Court

Verdict · Alameda County Superior Court, Oakland (Judge Winifred Y. Smith) · 2019

After trial: The jury's $1.0372 billion award to Alberta Pilliod was reduced by the trial court on Monsanto's new-trial motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 662.5: noneconomic damages were recalculated on the trial evidence and punitive damages were capped at a four-to-one ratio under State Farm v. Campbell, producing a judgment of $56,005,830 that she accepted. The Court of Appeal affirmed on August 9, 2021 (Pilliod v. Monsanto Co., A158228), the California Supreme Court denied review on November 17, 2021, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 27, 2022. The judgment is backed by Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018 and had set aside billions for Roundup liabilities; we did not find a public report of the payment date.

Won by Wisner Baum LLP.

Alberta Pilliod, a retired teacher and school administrator from Livermore, sprayed Roundup on the couple's properties for nearly 30 years and was diagnosed in April 2015 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in her central nervous system, which recurred in her brain in 2016. On May 13, 2019, an Alameda County jury awarded her about $37.2 million in compensatory damages and $1 billion in punitive damages, alongside a separate award to her husband. Judge Winifred Smith reduced her judgment to $56,005,830, the Court of Appeal affirmed in August 2021, and the California Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court both declined to disturb it.

What happened

Alberta Pilliod and her husband Alva bought Roundup for the first time in 1982 to keep weeds down at their home in Livermore, California. Over the next three decades they sprayed it on four properties: about a gallon a week, nine months a year, at their main residence, and more at rental and vacation properties they owned over the years. Alberta did roughly a quarter of the spraying herself. She wore flip-flops, shorts and a tank top, felt the mist settle on her hands, and did not wash it off because the label and the advertising told her the product was harmless to anything but plants. The Pilliods used both premixed Roundup and the concentrate, which Alva mixed in a sprayer.

Alberta had retired from teaching and school administration in 2004 and gone back to work as a substitute administrator. Her son described a social, active woman who went to the gym, walked, snorkeled and skied. In April 2015, at about age 70, she was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which in her case had taken hold in her central nervous system. She went through a punishing chemotherapy regimen with multi-day hospital stays, reached remission that September, then suffered a recurrence in her brain in July 2016 and more chemotherapy. By October 2017 she showed no evidence of disease, but the cancer and its treatment left her with permanent brain damage. Her husband had been diagnosed with the same lymphoma, in his bones, four years earlier.

The couple sued Monsanto in Alameda County Superior Court in 2017, alleging design defect and failure to warn. Monsanto asked to sever the two cases; Judge Winifred Y. Smith refused and tried them together over six weeks in spring 2019. The Court of Appeal's opinion names plaintiffs' counsel as Michael J. Miller, Jeffrey A. Travers and Curtis G. Hoke of The Miller Firm, R. Brent Wisner and Pedram Esfandiary of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, and Mark E. Burton of Audet & Partners. Plaintiffs' experts included Dr. Christopher Portier, who had served on the IARC glyphosate working group, and pathologist Dr. Dennis Weisenburger, who testified that Roundup, the only pesticide the Pilliods used in any quantity over 30 years, was a substantial factor in causing Alberta's cancer. The jury also heard evidence that Monsanto knew of a 1983 mouse study suggesting a cancer link and of its ghostwriting of articles attributed to independent scientists.

On May 13, 2019, the jury found for both plaintiffs on every claim. For Alberta it awarded about $200,000 in past economic loss, about $3 million in future economic loss, $8 million in past noneconomic loss, $26 million in future noneconomic loss, and $1 billion in punitive damages. Monsanto moved for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On July 26, 2019, Judge Smith rejected every liability argument, found clear and convincing evidence that Monsanto had made "continuous efforts to impede, discourage, or distort the scientific inquiry about glyphosate," but reduced the noneconomic damages to $1 million for each of the two years of intense treatment and $600,000 for each other past and future year, and cut punitive damages to a four-to-one ratio. She conditionally granted a new trial unless Alberta accepted judgment of $56,005,830, roughly $11.2 million compensatory and $44.8 million punitive. Alberta accepted while reserving the right to cross-appeal.

On August 9, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal, Division Two, affirmed in full, rejecting Monsanto's preemption, causation, instructional and attorney-misconduct arguments and the Pilliods' cross-appeal seeking restoration of the larger awards. The California Supreme Court denied review on November 17, 2021, and on June 27, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Monsanto's petition for certiorari (No. 21-1272), one week after refusing to hear the federal Hardeman case. The combined Pilliod judgments, about $86.7 million, were the largest Roundup award to survive appeal at the time.

Sources

This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.

More proven verdicts from Wisner Baum LLP

All Wisner Baum LLP proven verdicts →
$30,736,480 judgment after remittitur (about $6.1 million compensatory plus about $24.6 million punitive; jury awarded $18.05 million compensatory plus $1 billion punitive to Alva Pilliod; his wife Alberta's award is a separate row)VerdictReduced from $1.02 billionPaidProduct LiabilityCA

Alva Pilliod mixed and sprayed Roundup on the family's Livermore-area properties from 1982 until illness stopped him in 2011, the year he was diagnosed at 69 with stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in his bones. On May 13, 2019, an Alameda County jury awarded him about $18 million in compensatory damages and $1 billion in punitive damages, alongside a separate award to his wife. Judge Winifred Smith reduced his judgment to $30,736,480, the Court of Appeal affirmed in August 2021, and the California and U.S. Supreme Courts declined review.

2019 · Alameda County Superior Court, Oakland (Judge Winifred Y. Smith)Read the full story →
$20,506,418.64 judgment after appeal ($10,253,209.32 compensatory plus $10,253,209.32 punitive; $289.25 million jury verdict, cut to $78.5 million by the trial court and then to $20.5 million by the Court of Appeal)VerdictReduced from $289.3 millionPaidProduct LiabilityCA

Dewayne "Lee" Johnson sprayed Monsanto's Ranger Pro and Roundup Pro on Benicia school grounds for two to three years, was soaked by a burst hose in 2014, and was diagnosed that October with mycosis fungoides, a rare non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In August 2018 a San Francisco jury found Monsanto liable for failure to warn and design defect and returned $289.25 million, the first Roundup cancer verdict in the country. The trial judge cut punitive damages to match compensatory damages, for $78.5 million, and the Court of Appeal in July 2020 reduced the award to $20.5 million while affirming liability and malice. The California Supreme Court denied review in October 2020 and Bayer paid the judgment late that year.

2018 · San Francisco County Superior Court, San Francisco (Judge Suzanne Ramos Bolanos), Case No. CGC-16-550128Read the full story →
$3,000,000 jury verdict (reversed on appeal in 2018 on federal preemption grounds; nothing was collected)VerdictReversed on appealProduct LiabilityIL

Stewart Dolin, a 57-year-old Reed Smith partner, was prescribed Paxil for anxiety in July 2010, had the prescription filled with generic paroxetine, and six days later stepped in front of a CTA train in downtown Chicago. His widow Wendy Dolin sued GlaxoSmithKline, which controlled the paroxetine label, for failing to warn of an adult suicide risk. After a five-week federal trial a Chicago jury awarded $3 million on April 20, 2017. The Seventh Circuit reversed in August 2018, holding the claim preempted because the FDA had rejected an adult-suicidality warning in 2007, and the Supreme Court denied review in 2019.

2017 · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Chicago (Judge William T. Hart)Read the full story →

Related product liability verdicts

$25 billionSettlementGroup recoveryNY

Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.

Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo1998 · New York State (Master Settlement Agreement)Read the full story →
$14.7 billionSettlementCA

David Casey Jr. of CaseyGerry was appointed by Judge Charles Breyer as the sole San Diego attorney on the 22-member Plaintiffs' Steering Committee overseeing MDL 2672, the consolidated clean-diesel emissions fraud litigation that produced a $14.7 billion settlement against Volkswagen.

CaseyGerry2016 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (MDL 2672)Read the full story →
$11.3 billion (Florida share)SettlementGroup recoveryFL

C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.

The Yerrid Law Firm1997 · Florida (State v. American Tobacco Co.)Read the full story →
$11.3 billionSettlementGroup recoveryFL

Michael C. Maher's firm, Maher, Gibson & Guiley, P.A., was one of eleven private law firms appointed to the state's Peoples' Trial Advocates in Florida's Medicaid cost-recovery lawsuit against the major cigarette manufacturers, which produced an $11.3 billion settlement, the largest tobacco recovery by a single state in U.S. history at the time.

The Maher Law Firm1997 · Florida (State litigation)Read the full story →