$440 millionVerdict

$440 Million Helms-Burton Judgment Against Four Cruise Lines Over Confiscated Havana Docks

Verdict · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami) · 2022

Won by Colson Hicks Eidson.

A Miami federal court entered a roughly $440 million judgment against Carnival, Royal Caribbean, Norwegian, and MSC for using port terminals Cuba confiscated in 1960, a result the Supreme Court reinstated by a vote of 8 to 1 in 2026.

What happened

Havana Docks Corporation, a U.S. company, once held a long-term concession to operate the marine terminals at the Port of Havana. In 1960, Fidel Castro's government seized the property and paid nothing for it. The company never got its terminals back. Decades later, between 2016 and 2019, four of the world's largest cruise operators began bringing American passengers to those same docks.

In 1996, Congress passed the Helms-Burton Act. Title III of that law lets U.S. nationals sue anyone who "traffics" in property the Cuban government confiscated, but every president suspended the provision until 2019. Once the suspension lifted, Havana Docks sued Carnival, Royal Caribbean, Norwegian, and MSC, arguing that each company had profited from the very terminals taken from it.

Colson Hicks Eidson served as lead trial counsel for Havana Docks. Roberto Martinez led the team, working with Stephanie Casey, Zachary Lipshultz, Aziza Elayan, Thomas Kroeger, and Sabrina Saieh. The firm proved that each line had used the confiscated docks to bring cruise passengers ashore and back aboard, and that those voyages fell outside the law's narrow exception for lawful travel.

In 2022, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami agreed. She found all four companies liable and entered judgment of about $439 million, an amount widely reported as roughly $440 million. It was the first money judgment of its kind under Title III.

The cruise lines appealed, and the Eleventh Circuit set the award aside. That court reasoned that the Havana Docks concession would have expired on its own terms in 2004, so the later voyages did not count as trafficking in property the company still held.

On May 21, 2026, the Supreme Court reversed the appeals court by a vote of 8 to 1. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas held that once property is confiscated, a party that later uses it can be liable regardless of what would have happened to the original owner's interest. Justice Elena Kagan was the lone dissenter. The decision reinstates the judgment but returns the case to the lower court, where the companies may still press remaining defenses before the roughly $440 million becomes final.

Sources

This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.

More proven verdicts from Colson Hicks Eidson

All Colson Hicks Eidson proven verdicts →
$1.02 billionSettlementGroup recoveryWrongful DeathFL

The families of 98 people killed in the June 2021 Champlain Towers South collapse in Surfside, Florida, recovered over $1 billion through a class settlement run by a court-appointed Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, with final approval reached in under a year.

2022 · Miami-Dade Circuit Court, Miami, FLRead the full story →
$100 millionSettlementClass ActionsFL

Colson Hicks Eidson served as co-counsel to a class of Jewish families and helped reach a roughly $100 million settlement with Service Corporation International after workers at two South Florida Menorah Gardens cemeteries buried people in the wrong graves and discarded scattered remains.

2003 · Broward/Palm Beach County Circuit Court, FLRead the full story →
$65.1 millionVerdictWrongful DeathFL

A Miami-Dade jury found Eller Media liable for the 1998 electrocution of a 12-year-old boy at a bus shelter wired by unlicensed electricians and awarded $65.1 million.

2005 · Miami-Dade Circuit Court, FLRead the full story →
$60.9 millionVerdictMedical MalpracticeFL

A federal judge found the Navy's Jacksonville hospital liable for the brain injury of a baby born in distress and entered a $60.9 million award, then the largest Federal Tort Claims Act recovery in the country, before part of it was cut on appeal.

2005 · U.S. District Court, Southern District of FloridaRead the full story →

Related Florida verdicts

$23.6 billionVerdictReversed on appealFL

A Pensacola jury awarded Cynthia Robinson $23.6 billion in punitive damages against R.J. Reynolds over the 1996 lung cancer death of her 36-year-old husband, the largest single-plaintiff award of Florida's Engle tobacco litigation, but the trial judge called the number constitutionally excessive, an appeals court ordered a full retrial over improper closing arguments, and a second jury returned a complete defense verdict in 2019, so the estate ultimately collected nothing.

Gary, Williams, Parenti, Watson & Gary, P.L.L.C.2014 · First Judicial Circuit, Escambia County, FloridaRead the full story →
$11.3 billionSettlementGroup recoveryFL

C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.

The Yerrid Law Firm, Terrell Hogan and The Maher Law Firm1997 · Florida (State v. American Tobacco Co.)Read the full story →
$1.5 billion+SettlementGroup recoveryFL

Court-appointed Chair Lead Counsel Peter Prieto of Podhurst Orseck coordinated the nation's largest automotive defect MDL, securing more than $1.5 billion in settlements from seven automakers for tens of millions of vehicle owners harmed by defective Takata airbag inflators.

Podhurst Orseck PA2020 · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, MiamiRead the full story →
$1.1 billionVerdictNot collectableFL

A Polk County jury awarded $110 million in compensatory damages and $1 billion in punitive damages over the death of 69-year-old Arlene Townsend, who fell 17 times at the Auburndale Oaks Healthcare Center, in a Wilkes & McHugh case against Trans Healthcare entities that had defaulted, stopped defending, and were already insolvent and in receivership, which is why the judgment was largely symbolic and the estate ultimately recovered only a small share of a later multi-estate settlement.

Wilkes & Associates, P.A.2013 · Tenth Judicial Circuit, Polk County, FloridaRead the full story →