$110,000 Verdict for Pregnant Attorney Denied Work-From-Home, a Landmark ADA Telecommute Ruling
Won by Donati Law.
A Memphis jury sided with in-house attorney Andrea Mosby-Meachem after her employer refused a physician-ordered telecommuting accommodation during a high-risk pregnancy, and the Sixth Circuit later affirmed the verdict in a nationally cited ADA ruling on remote work.
What happened
Andrea Mosby-Meachem had worked as an in-house labor, employment, and workers' compensation attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division since 2005. In early 2013, her physician ordered ten weeks of bed rest for pregnancy complications. She asked MLG&W to let her work from home during that period, pointing out that she had already performed the same job functions remotely for two weeks in 2012 while recovering from neck surgery without any reported problems.
MLG&W's ADA committee rejected the request. The utility argued that in-person attendance was an essential function of her position and raised confidentiality concerns about remote work. Mosby-Meachem continued working from home after the request was formally denied, handling her caseload without apparent disruption, until she was ultimately forced to take leave.
She filed suit in late 2013 asserting disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to accommodate. Donati Law attorneys William B. Ryan and Janelle Osowski represented her through trial. The jury returned a verdict for Mosby-Meachem on the ADA failure-to-accommodate claim and awarded $92,000 in compensatory damages. The district court separately awarded $18,184.32 in back pay, bringing the total to approximately $110,000. The jury found against Mosby-Meachem on her pregnancy discrimination and retaliation claims.
MLG&W moved for judgment as a matter of law and, separately, appealed to the Sixth Circuit. A three-judge panel, in a February 2018 opinion authored by Judges Gibbons, Guy, and Cook, affirmed every aspect of the district court's rulings. The panel found sufficient evidence that in-person attendance was not essential for a ten-week period given the nature of the work, the fact that the employer allowed telework in practice despite having no formal policy, and the gap between the twenty-year-old job description and actual modern work conditions.
The ruling is cited frequently in ADA accommodation cases for its analysis of when telecommuting qualifies as a reasonable accommodation. The Sixth Circuit's opinion is published at 883 F.3d 595.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.FindLaw: Mosby-Meachem v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, 883 F.3d 595 (6th Cir. 2018)·Archived copy
- 2.CourtListener: Andrea Mosby-Meachem v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. (6th Cir. 2018)·Archived copy
- 3.Frantz Ward LLP: 6th Circuit Holds That Telecommuting May Be a Reasonable Accommodation (2018)·Archived copy
Related civil rights verdicts
An Essex County jury awarded $165.97 million against the State of New Jersey and its Division of Youth and Family Services for failing to remove an infant from his home despite his grandmother's abuse report, a verdict reported as the largest in state personal injury history. The trial judge cut it to $102.6 million on remittitur, and in April 2017 the Appellate Division reversed the judgment entirely on qualified immunity grounds under the Tort Claims Act. The family collected nothing from the State.
On December 14, 2019 Emily Gaines, an 18-year-old Moore High School senior, was driving to take the ACT when Sgt. Kyle Lloyd of the Moore Police Department, off duty and rushing a key to another officer's patrol car for a department event, hit her broadside at 95 to 100 mph in a 50 zone. She died at the scene. On April 1, 2026 a federal jury returned $126,000,000. The court entered $90,000,000 against Lloyd, who is in prison, and cut the $36,000,000 against the City to $125,000 under Oklahoma's Governmental Tort Claims Act.
The Popham Law Firm secured a $57 million settlement on behalf of more than 1,700 Sprint employees who alleged the company's automated performance system unlawfully targeted workers over 40 during a series of mass layoffs, at the time the largest ADEA class settlement in the District of Kansas.
Ben Crump, with Connecticut co-counsel Louis Rubano and R.J. Weber, secured a $45 million settlement from the City of New Haven for Richard "Randy" Cox, who was left paralyzed from the chest down after being thrown headfirst into the wall of a police transport van while handcuffed. At announcement it was described as the largest settlement ever reached in a U.S. police-misconduct case, surpassing the George Floyd settlement.