Nevada Supreme Court Rules Overtime Counts as 'Full Wages' in Workers Comp Reopening Fight
Won by GGRM Law Firm.
GGRM attorney Jason Mills secured a Nevada Supreme Court ruling that 'full wages' under the workers comp reopening statute includes overtime pay, giving Henderson firefighter Brian Wolfgram lifetime rights to reopen his claim.
What happened
Brian Wolfgram worked as a firefighter for the City of Henderson and, like many first responders, regularly supplemented his base salary with overtime shifts. Before his injury, overtime was a consistent and predictable part of his income, accounting for roughly 15 percent of what he earned.
Wolfgram suffered an occupational injury to his hands and elbows. His doctor placed him on light-duty restrictions for just over two weeks. During that stretch, the City paid his base salary in full but barred him from working any overtime. When the claim closed on January 26, 2015, no one had formally addressed the lost overtime.
Nearly two years later, Wolfgram sought to reopen the claim as his medical condition resurfaced. The City and its insurer, CCMSI, pushed back. Their argument was that he had earned his 'full wages' while on light duty because the City paid every dollar of his base pay. Under NRS 616C.400(1), an employee can only reopen a claim beyond the standard one-year window if the original injury incapacitated him from earning full wages for the statutory minimum period.
Jason Mills of Greenman Goldberg Raby and Martinez argued that full wages could not be read to mean base pay alone for a worker whose normal earnings routinely included overtime. A workers' compensation appeals officer agreed. The district court denied the City's petition for judicial review.
On December 23, 2021, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed, issuing a published opinion under citation 501 P.3d 422. The court held that the term 'full wages' in NRS 616C.400(1) encompasses overtime pay, not just base salary. Because Wolfgram had been prohibited from earning overtime he would otherwise have worked, he was incapacitated from earning his full wages during the light-duty period. That finding gave him lifetime reopening rights under NRS 616C.390(1).
The decision set precedent that subsequently applied in City of Henderson v. Law (Nev. Ct. App. 2022), where the Court of Appeals extended the same logic to another injured City of Henderson employee under materially identical facts.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from GGRM Law Firm
All GGRM Law Firm proven verdicts →A unanimous Nevada Supreme Court held in April 2023 that an employer invoking the predisposing-condition defense to deny a first responder's heart-disease benefits must affirmatively prove four elements, including that the employee actually had the ability to correct the condition ordered by a physician.
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted a totality-of-circumstances test for the law-enforcement exception to the going-and-coming rule, affirming workers' compensation coverage for a Las Vegas Metro traffic officer injured while commuting after his sergeant ordered him to get motorcycle seat time.
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that employees required to drive for work face employment-related road risks, adopting the actual street-risk rule and extending the special-errand exception to include return journeys, in a workers' compensation case argued by GGRM's Gabriel Martinez.
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in 1993 that Texaco could not claim workers' compensation immunity for injuries suffered by an employee of its wholly owned subsidiary, reversing a summary judgment that had blocked the injured worker's lawsuit.
Related workplace injury verdicts
After nearly 30 years of litigation, Markovits Stock and DeMarco secured a $742 million-plus-interest settlement for approximately 23,000 Navistar retirees whose healthcare and life insurance benefits had been repeatedly reduced.
Paul Napoli served as court-appointed co-liaison counsel for nearly 10,000 firefighters, police officers, and construction workers who developed respiratory diseases after working at Ground Zero, securing a settlement worth up to $712.5 million against the city and its contractors.
Jose Valdivia, 25, was building scaffolding at the Phillips 66 refinery in Lake Charles when a co-worker above him lost his grip on a steel scaffold bar. It struck him on the head and spine through a hard hat and full protective equipment. He is in a wheelchair with limited speech. Brock never reported the accident to OSHA.
On September 7, 2019, Ulysses Cruz, a 48-year-old United Airlines ramp worker serving as a wing walker at George Bush Intercontinental Airport, was struck from behind by an Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Houston van whose driver said the morning sun was in his eyes. Cruz was paralyzed from the chest down and suffered a stroke two days later that cost him the use of his dominant right arm. After a two-week trial before Judge Ravi Sandill, a Harris County jury on October 25, 2021 found Allied 70 percent and driver Reginald Willis 30 percent at fault and awarded Cruz, his wife and their two children $352.7 million in compensatory damages. Judge Sandill conditioned denial of a new trial on a $117.5 million remittitur of noneconomic damages, which the family accepted, and an amended judgment of about $235.3 million was signed February 7, 2022. Allied appealed, the parties reached a confidential mediated settlement, and on July 18, 2023 the First Court of Appeals vacated the judgment and dismissed the case at the parties' joint request.