$2.73 Million Verdict Against Lawrence Livermore Lab for Breaching Seniority Policy in 2008 Layoffs
An Alameda County jury awarded $2.73 million to five test plaintiffs after finding that Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC violated its own inverse-seniority layoff policy when it cut more than 400 workers in 2008.
What happened
In May 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC (LLNS) carried out a major workforce reduction at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, dismissing more than 400 permanent career employees, including roughly 160 scientists. LLNS had taken over management of the lab from the University of California in October 2007, about seven months earlier, as part of a privatization led by a consortium that included Bechtel Corporation. Many of the workers who were let go had spent decades at the facility, averaging 54 years old with about 20 years of seniority.
The employees filed suit in Alameda County Superior Court alleging that LLNS had breached their employment contracts. Their core argument: the lab's own written layoff policy required reductions to proceed in inverse order of seniority, meaning the longest-tenured workers should have been the last to go. Instead, those workers were disproportionately the ones let go.
Because more than 130 plaintiffs had parallel claims, Judge Robert Freedman selected five workers to proceed first as test plaintiffs: Elaine Andrews, Marian Barraza, Mario Jimenez, Greg Olsen, and James Torrice. Their breach-of-contract phase ran from March 18 to May 10, 2013. Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli and Brewer attorneys J. Gary Gwilliam, Randall Strauss, and Robert Schwartz handled the case for the plaintiffs.
On May 10, 2013, the jury found for all five plaintiffs. Total damages came to $2,728,327. Individual awards ranged from $443,299 (Barraza) to $853,010 (Jimenez), with Olsen receiving $704,234 and Torrice $485,783. A second trial on age-discrimination claims resulted in a defense verdict for the lab.
Both verdicts were on appeal when, at the encouragement of Judge Freedman, the parties entered mediation. On September 30, 2015, LLNS agreed to pay $37.25 million to resolve the contract claims of 129 of the 130 plaintiffs. One plaintiff did not join the settlement. The lab maintained throughout that it had done nothing wrong in connection with the 2008 reduction.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.Alameda-Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association: $37.25M Settlement in Lawsuit Over 2008 Layoff at Lawrence Livermore Lab·Archived copy
- 2.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Settlement Reached in Long-Running Lawsuit (October 2015)·Archived copy
- 3.Livermore Patch: Laid-Off Livermore Lab Workers Reach $37M Settlement·Archived copy
- 4.Courtroom View Network: Andrews v. Lawrence Livermore Nat'l Security, Trial (March to May 2013)·Archived copy
- 5.GovInfo.gov: Andrews v. Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC, Federal Docket (Case No. 4:11-cv-03930)·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer
All Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer proven verdicts →One hundred twenty-nine former Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory workers, most of them over 50, shared a $37.25 million settlement after a series of jury trials established that the lab breached their employment contracts during a 2008 mass layoff that followed privatization of the facility.
Stanislaus County agreed to pay $22.5 million to settle a federal civil rights suit brought by criminal defense attorney Frank Carson's estate and seven co-plaintiffs who were acquitted after a years-long murder conspiracy prosecution. The firm served as co-lead trial counsel, representing four of the eight plaintiffs and negotiating roughly $12 million of the total; Morrison & Foerster represented the other four.
A Contra Costa County jury awarded Sherrill Smothers $6.1 million after finding General Motors 80% liable for the defective roof design of his 1984 Corvette, which collapsed during a 1988 rollover and left him a quadriplegic.
A woman in a methamphetamine-induced crisis was shot and killed by a Union City police officer on March 7, 1998. Her daughter, father and brother sued, and an Alameda County jury in May 2001 found the officer and city liable for negligence and battery, awarding $1,935,600 in total. After the court of appeal reallocated fault to 91 percent for the officer and 9 percent for the decedent, the amount that stood is $1,761,396.
Related workplace injury verdicts
After nearly 30 years of litigation, Markovits Stock and DeMarco secured a $742 million-plus-interest settlement for approximately 23,000 Navistar retirees whose healthcare and life insurance benefits had been repeatedly reduced.
Paul Napoli served as court-appointed co-liaison counsel for nearly 10,000 firefighters, police officers, and construction workers who developed respiratory diseases after working at Ground Zero, securing a settlement worth up to $712.5 million against the city and its contractors.
Jose Valdivia, 25, was building scaffolding at the Phillips 66 refinery in Lake Charles when a co-worker above him lost his grip on a steel scaffold bar. It struck him on the head and spine through a hard hat and full protective equipment. He is in a wheelchair with limited speech. Brock never reported the accident to OSHA.
On September 7, 2019, Ulysses Cruz, a 48-year-old United Airlines ramp worker serving as a wing walker at George Bush Intercontinental Airport, was struck from behind by an Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Houston van whose driver said the morning sun was in his eyes. Cruz was paralyzed from the chest down and suffered a stroke two days later that cost him the use of his dominant right arm. After a two-week trial before Judge Ravi Sandill, a Harris County jury on October 25, 2021 found Allied 70 percent and driver Reginald Willis 30 percent at fault and awarded Cruz, his wife and their two children $352.7 million in compensatory damages. Judge Sandill conditioned denial of a new trial on a $117.5 million remittitur of noneconomic damages, which the family accepted, and an amended judgment of about $235.3 million was signed February 7, 2022. Allied appealed, the parties reached a confidential mediated settlement, and on July 18, 2023 the First Court of Appeals vacated the judgment and dismissed the case at the parties' joint request.