$37.25 Million Settlement for 129 Former Livermore Lab Workers After Juries Found Contract Breaches
One hundred twenty-nine former Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory workers, most of them over 50, shared a $37.25 million settlement after a series of jury trials established that the lab breached their employment contracts during a 2008 mass layoff that followed privatization of the facility.
What happened
In late 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, the private consortium that had just taken over management of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from the federal government, eliminated more than 400 positions in a sweeping workforce reduction. The vast majority of those cut were long-tenured scientists, engineers, and technical staff who were over 40, with the average age of the plaintiffs around 54 and average seniority near 20 years. Many had spent decades at the lab under employment policies they understood to provide protection against arbitrary termination.
A group of 130 former employees, led by plaintiff Elaine Andrews, sued in Alameda County Superior Court. Their central claim was not just age discrimination but breach of contract: the lab had made specific promises about how layoffs would be conducted, and those promises were broken when Bechtel Corp. and its partners restructured operations after privatization. Workers described the process as sudden, opaque, and contrary to the procedures they had been guaranteed.
Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli and Brewer attorneys J. Gary Gwilliam, Randall Strauss, and Robert Schwartz structured the litigation around a group of five test plaintiffs, a common approach in mass employment cases that allows a jury's liability finding to carry over to the broader group. Two separate trials proceeded before Judge Robert Freedman in 2013. The jury in the breach-of-contract trial returned a verdict of $2.73 million for the five test plaintiffs, with individual awards ranging from $242,000 to $853,000. The lab prevailed in the separate age-discrimination trial.
The 2013 breach-of-contract verdict set the factual foundation for the remaining 125 plaintiffs. Months of mediation followed, and in October 2015 the parties announced a settlement of $37.25 million in contract damages covering 129 of the 130 plaintiffs. One plaintiff did not join the settlement. Lawrence Livermore National Security denied any wrongdoing.
The case number assigned in Alameda County Superior Court was RG09453596. The CVN trial record confirms Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe represented the lab throughout the proceedings.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory official news: Settlement Reached in Long-Running Lawsuit (2015)·Archived copy
- 2.East Bay Express: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Wrongful-Termination Lawsuit Moves Closer to Court·Archived copy
- 3.Courtroom View Network: Andrews v. Lawrence Livermore National Security: Trial Record (verdict, attorneys, court)·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer
All Gwilliam Ivary Chiosso Cavalli & Brewer proven verdicts →Stanislaus County agreed to pay $22.5 million to settle a federal civil rights suit brought by criminal defense attorney Frank Carson's estate and seven co-plaintiffs who were acquitted after a years-long murder conspiracy prosecution. The firm served as co-lead trial counsel, representing four of the eight plaintiffs and negotiating roughly $12 million of the total; Morrison & Foerster represented the other four.
A Contra Costa County jury awarded Sherrill Smothers $6.1 million after finding General Motors 80% liable for the defective roof design of his 1984 Corvette, which collapsed during a 1988 rollover and left him a quadriplegic.
An Alameda County jury awarded $2.73 million to five test plaintiffs after finding that Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC violated its own inverse-seniority layoff policy when it cut more than 400 workers in 2008.
A woman in a methamphetamine-induced crisis was shot and killed by a Union City police officer on March 7, 1998. Her daughter, father and brother sued, and an Alameda County jury in May 2001 found the officer and city liable for negligence and battery, awarding $1,935,600 in total. After the court of appeal reallocated fault to 91 percent for the officer and 9 percent for the decedent, the amount that stood is $1,761,396.
Related workplace injury verdicts
After nearly 30 years of litigation, Markovits Stock and DeMarco secured a $742 million-plus-interest settlement for approximately 23,000 Navistar retirees whose healthcare and life insurance benefits had been repeatedly reduced.
Paul Napoli served as court-appointed co-liaison counsel for nearly 10,000 firefighters, police officers, and construction workers who developed respiratory diseases after working at Ground Zero, securing a settlement worth up to $712.5 million against the city and its contractors.
Jose Valdivia, 25, was building scaffolding at the Phillips 66 refinery in Lake Charles when a co-worker above him lost his grip on a steel scaffold bar. It struck him on the head and spine through a hard hat and full protective equipment. He is in a wheelchair with limited speech. Brock never reported the accident to OSHA.
On September 7, 2019, Ulysses Cruz, a 48-year-old United Airlines ramp worker serving as a wing walker at George Bush Intercontinental Airport, was struck from behind by an Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Houston van whose driver said the morning sun was in his eyes. Cruz was paralyzed from the chest down and suffered a stroke two days later that cost him the use of his dominant right arm. After a two-week trial before Judge Ravi Sandill, a Harris County jury on October 25, 2021 found Allied 70 percent and driver Reginald Willis 30 percent at fault and awarded Cruz, his wife and their two children $352.7 million in compensatory damages. Judge Sandill conditioned denial of a new trial on a $117.5 million remittitur of noneconomic damages, which the family accepted, and an amended judgment of about $235.3 million was signed February 7, 2022. Allied appealed, the parties reached a confidential mediated settlement, and on July 18, 2023 the First Court of Appeals vacated the judgment and dismissed the case at the parties' joint request.