$135 Million Dram Shop Verdict Against Giants Stadium Beer Vendor for Child Paralyzed by Drunk Fan, Later Reversed and Settled for $25 Million
After trial: The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the verdict in August 2006. On remand the case settled in 2008 for $25 million in cash and annuities.
Won by Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC.
A Bergen County jury ordered stadium concessionaire Aramark and drunk driver Daniel Lanzaro to pay roughly $135 million after Lanzaro, served beer at Giants Stadium despite visible intoxication, crashed into the Verni family's car and left their two-year-old daughter paralyzed from the neck down. The verdict was reversed on appeal in 2006, and the case settled in 2008 for $25 million in cash and annuities.
What happened
In 1999, Daniel Lanzaro spent a New York Giants game at Giants Stadium drinking heavily. Concession workers employed by Aramark, the stadium's beer vendor, kept serving him. He later admitted buying six beers at halftime even though he was already visibly drunk. Driving home after the game, with a blood alcohol level more than double the legal limit, he crashed into a car carrying the Verni family. The family's two-year-old daughter was left paralyzed from the neck down. Her mother, Fazila, was also injured.
The family sued Aramark and its related concession entities under New Jersey's dram shop law, which allows liability when a server sells alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person. David Mazie, then a partner at Nagel, Rice & Mazie, tried the case in the Superior Court of New Jersey in Bergen County alongside David Freeman. Trial began in December 2004 and ran into the new year.
In January 2005 the jury found Lanzaro and the Aramark defendants equally responsible and returned one of the largest alcohol liability awards ever recorded in the United States: roughly $135 million in total damages. That figure included about $60 million in compensatory damages, with $53.95 million for the child and $6.5 million for her mother, plus $75 million in punitive damages assessed against Aramark. Aramark's share of the judgment came to about $105 million, $30 million compensatory and the full $75 million punitive.
The verdict did not stand. On August 3, 2006, the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed and ordered a new trial. The panel held that the trial court had improperly admitted extensive testimony about a "culture of intoxication" at the stadium. Under the state's beverage server law, liability turns on whether a vendor served a visibly intoxicated patron, not on the general drinking atmosphere at the venue, and the appellate judges found the evidence went to the heart of the plaintiffs' case without a limiting instruction.
Rather than retry the case, the parties settled in 2008. Aramark and its co-defendants agreed to pay $25 million in cash and annuities. The child, by then ten years old and living as a quadriplegic, received the bulk of it with her mother: $19.5 million in cash plus annuities generating more than $60,000 a month for life, guaranteed for 25 years. By the time of the settlement, Mazie and Freeman had left Nagel Rice to co-found Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, which carried the case through the appeal and resolution; the court approved a $5.2 million fee to the firm.
Lanzaro answered for the crash separately. He pleaded guilty to vehicular assault, received a five-year prison term, and paid the family $200,000 from his insurance toward his share of the damages.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.NBC News / Associated Press: Verdict against stadium beer vendor overturned (Aug. 2006; confirms $135 million total, Aramark's $30 million compensatory and $75 million punitive share, .226 blood alcohol level, reversal reasoning)
- 2.N.J. Appellate Division opinion, Aug. 3, 2006 (verdict breakdown: $53.95 million and $6.5 million compensatory, $75 million punitive; reversal for improper culture-of-intoxication evidence; names David A. Mazie of Nagel, Rice & Mazie and David M. Freeman as plaintiffs' counsel)
- 3.Jonathan Turley: Giants Stadium settles dram shop case for $25 million (Dec. 2008; settlement structure of $19.5 million cash and annuities paying over $60,000 monthly, $5.2 million fee to Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman)
- 4.CBS News / Associated Press: $105M verdict vs. beer vendor tossed (confirms Lanzaro's guilty plea to vehicular assault, five-year prison term, and his $200,000 insurance settlement with the family)
- 5.Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC (firm)
More proven verdicts from Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC
All Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC proven verdicts →An Essex County jury awarded $165.97 million against the State of New Jersey and its Division of Youth and Family Services for failing to remove an infant from his home despite his grandmother's abuse report, a verdict reported as the largest in state personal injury history. The trial judge cut it to $102.6 million on remittitur, and in April 2017 the Appellate Division reversed the judgment entirely on qualified immunity grounds under the Tort Claims Act. The family collected nothing from the State.
A 43-year-old utility pole that Verizon had been told to remove in 1999 snapped and fell on attorney Maria Moser Meister at a Union City bus stop in 2017, leaving her with a severe brain injury and paralysis. In May 2020 a New Jersey judge approved a $125 million settlement, reported as the largest personal injury settlement in state history.
In April 2018, the first New Jersey trial over C.R. Bard's pelvic mesh implants ended with a $68 million verdict for Mary McGinnis and her husband: $33 million in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages. On July 25, 2023, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed, holding that Bard was denied a fair trial because the jury never heard that the FDA had cleared the devices through the 510(k) process, and ordered a new trial on all issues. No retrial verdict or disclosed settlement has been publicly reported since.
A boy born at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center in 1998 developed cerebral palsy after doctors waited too long to perform a cesarean section despite clear signs of fetal distress. In April 2010, an Essex County jury awarded $18.5 million, and the family recovered $16.75 million under a high-low agreement reached during deliberations.
Related car accident verdicts
On December 7, 2021, a Nueces County jury in Corpus Christi returned $1.04 billion in actual damages and $300 billion in exemplary damages, about $301.04 billion in total, against Beer Belly's Sports Bar and its owner for overserving a driver who killed Tamra Kay Kindred, 59, and her 16-year-old granddaughter in a 2017 crash. It was reported as the largest jury verdict ever recorded, and the honest frame is that it was built to be symbolic: the bar had closed in 2019, Texas does not require bars to carry liquor liability insurance, and the family and its lawyers said openly that they expected to recover nothing and sought the number as a public statement against drunk driving. John Flood of Flood Trial Lawyers was lead counsel, with Sico, Hoelscher & Harris LLP as co-counsel; Craig Sico delivered the closing argument that asked jurors to decide how loudly their voice would be heard.
An Oakland County jury awarded $896.5 million to a young boy who was struck by a prototype test car during a student field trip at a Continental test track, reported as the largest verdict in Michigan history. The award is pre-appeal: post-trial motions are pending, Continental never made a settlement offer, and the amount could still be reduced.
A Bexar County jury awarded roughly $831 million to Blas Mendez Jr., a longtime Seguin ISD special education behavior specialist left partially paralyzed after his motorcycle hit wreckage left in the road by an 18-year-old drunk driver who had been served at Koozies Icehouse & Grill in New Braunfels. Todd A. Hunter of Hunter Trial Law tried the dram shop case with E. Chevo Pastrano and Ginna G. Pastrano of The Pastrano Law Firm. The honest frame: the award was reported as the largest verdict ever returned by a San Antonio jury, and the bar had already closed by the time it came in, so the family is not expected to collect most, if any, of it.