HomeCaliforniaLos AngelesMcGee Lerer OgrinProven verdictsClass Action Against Bird, Lime, Xiaomi, and Segway for E-Scooter Injuries
Settlement

Class Action Against Bird, Lime, Xiaomi, and Segway for E-Scooter Injuries

Settlement · Los Angeles Superior Court / U.S. District Court, Central District of California · 2018

Won by McGee Lerer Ogrin.

Catherine Lerer of McGee Lerer, co-counseling with Costell & Cornelius, filed a class action in October 2018 against Bird, Lime, Xiaomi, and Segway on behalf of riders and pedestrians seriously injured by dockless e-scooters deployed across Los Angeles.

What happened

In the fall of 2017, Bird began releasing thousands of dockless electric scooters onto the sidewalks and piers of Los Angeles and Santa Monica without seeking city permits or conducting rider-safety programs. Lime followed within months. By late 2018, emergency rooms were recording broken arms, fractured orbital sockets, knocked-out teeth, and at least three deaths nationally.

On October 19, 2018, Catherine Lerer of McGee Lerer, serving as co-counsel with Costell & Cornelius, filed a class action in Los Angeles County Superior Court naming Bird Rides, Lime, Xiaomi Corporation, and Segway as defendants. The complaint alleged gross negligence, product defects, and what the filing described as 'aiding and abetting assault' through willful indifference to public safety. Defendant Segway removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, creating parallel proceedings.

The eight original plaintiffs described a range of serious harm. David Petersen, 62, was performing on the Santa Monica Pier when a Bird scooter struck him, severing his bicep and requiring surgery. Tina Ogata tripped over three Lime scooters left across a sidewalk, fracturing her wrist and finger. Other plaintiffs reported head injuries, loss of consciousness, fractured legs, and lacerations requiring emergency care. Within days of filing, more than 75 additional potential class members contacted the firm, including a 67-year-old who suffered a brain injury and a seven-year-old struck while walking who sustained damage to eight front teeth.

The core theory pressed by Lerer was that Bird and Lime knew their devices were dangerous and deployed them in ways 'certain to cause injuries.' The complaint documented how the companies incentivized independent chargers not to report damaged scooters by withholding payment for broken units, leaving defective hardware in circulation. Neither Bird nor Lime required helmets, neither fitted scooters with license plates or identifying markings, and neither restricted sidewalk riding at launch.

Court records show Bird filed a declaration in May 2021 seeking in-camera review to disclose settlement amounts, confirming the case resolved before trial. The Los Angeles Superior Court docket reflects the matter as disposed. No public settlement figure was disclosed.

Sources

This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.

More proven verdicts from McGee Lerer Ogrin

All McGee Lerer Ogrin proven verdicts →
$122.5 millionSettlementGroup recoveryPremises LiabilityCA

McGee Lerer Ogrin represented 14 of the 124 survivors whose claims were resolved in a $122.5 million settlement with the City of Santa Monica over decades of child sexual abuse by a PAL volunteer the city failed to stop.

2023 · Los Angeles Superior Court / City of Santa MonicaRead the full story →
ConfidentialVerdictPremises LiabilityCA

In a landmark April 2023 ruling, California's Second District Court of Appeal reversed dismissal of a pedestrian trip-and-fall lawsuit, holding that Bird Rides owes a general duty of ordinary care over its dock-less scooters and can be sued when improperly parked scooters injure members of the public.

2023 · Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California (Case B316374)Read the full story →
ConfidentialSlip & FallCA

In November 2019, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge overruled demurrers filed by Lyft and the City of Santa Monica, finding that an 88-year-old woman who sustained five pelvic fractures after tripping over a Lyft scooter in a posted no-deployment zone had stated viable negligence and public-nuisance claims against both defendants.

2019 · Los Angeles Superior CourtRead the full story →

Related product liability verdicts

$25 billionSettlementGroup recoveryNY

Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.

Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo1998 · New York State (Master Settlement Agreement)Read the full story →
$11.3 billionSettlementGroup recoveryFL

C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.

The Yerrid Law Firm, Terrell Hogan and The Maher Law Firm1997 · Florida (State v. American Tobacco Co.)Read the full story →
$10.9 billionSettlementGroup recoveryCA

As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.

Weitz & Luxenberg2020 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (MDL No. 2741)Read the full story →
$5.5 billionSettlementGroup recoveryNJ

After fifteen years of litigation and three failed bankruptcy maneuvers by Johnson and Johnson subsidiaries, Ashcraft and Gerel attorneys R. Bryant McCulley and Michelle Parfitt helped negotiate a global, uncapped settlement of at least $5.5 billion covering approximately 76,000 ovarian-cancer claims.

Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP2026 · D.N.J. MDL No. 2738Read the full story →