Andrew Portis
About Andrew Portis
Andrew R. Portis is an attorney at Mueller Schmidt Mulholland & Cooling, PLLC with over 15 years of legal practice, including 13 years focused almost exclusively on workers' compensation law. His practice covers personal injury and workers' compensation cases.
A Mason City, Iowa native, Portis earned his B.A. in Criminology with a Spanish minor cum laude from the University of Northern Iowa in 2006. He earned his Juris Doctor cum laude with a litigation concentration from Creighton University School of Law in Omaha, Nebraska in 2010, where he served on the Creighton Law Review and participated in national trial and moot court teams.
He was admitted to the Iowa and Nebraska state bars in 2010.
Portis is a member of the Iowa Bar Association, the Nebraska Bar Association, the Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys, and the Iowa Association of Justice. He is a Trial Lawyer College graduate.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Mueller Schmidt Mulholland & Cooling, PLLC
These results are credited to Mueller Schmidt Mulholland & Cooling, PLLC. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Dallas County jury returned a $79,895.55 plaintiff verdict in December 2019 in a motor vehicle personal injury case, with Richard Schmidt and Dustin Mueller of Mueller Schmidt Mulholland and Cooling, PLLC, representing passenger Lorene Arbuckle against defendant Jocelyn Anne Kirchner.
A Warren County jury returned a $6,000 verdict for plaintiffs Jonna Audino and Trenton Shever following a motor vehicle collision, with Hannah Moreland and Dustin Mueller of Mueller Schmidt Mulholland and Cooling trying the case to verdict in April 2024.
A Dubuque County jury determined damages for an injured plaintiff in a November 2021 underinsured motorist trial against Allstate Property and Casualty, with Allstate having already admitted liability before the case went to the jury, and Connor Mulholland of Mueller Schmidt Mulholland and Cooling, PLLC representing the plaintiff.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
