$25,000Verdict

$25,000 Verdict Reinstated for Woman Beaten at Ranch Bowl Dance by Nebraska Supreme Court

Verdict · Douglas County / Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

Won by Rensch and Rensch.

The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a post-verdict judgment for the defense and reinstated a $25,000 jury award for a patron beaten at an after-hours Ranch Bowl dance, holding that a venue with three fights per night cannot call a restroom attack unforeseeable.

What happened

Shortly after 1 a.m. on May 17, 1992, Tarsha Hulett went to the Ranch Bowl in Omaha for an after-hours dance event open to adults 18 and older. While she was in the women's restroom, another patron attacked her with a glass beer mug. Hulett was injured in the assault and sued the Ranch Bowl for failing to maintain a reasonably safe premises for its guests.

At trial in Douglas County District Court, the jury heard evidence about conditions at Ranch Bowl during the after-hours dances. One venue employee testified that altercations were a regular feature of these events, with an average of three fights occurring every single night that employee worked. The jury credited that evidence and returned a verdict for Hulett in the amount of $25,000.

The trial judge set aside the verdict on the Ranch Bowl's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court concluded that because the attack on Hulett occurred suddenly and without warning to her, it was therefore unforeseeable as a matter of law. The judge entered judgment for the defendant.

Richard J. Rensch, of Raynor, Rensch and Pfeiffer, P.C., appealed on Hulett's behalf. The central argument was that the district court had conflated two distinct questions: whether Hulett personally anticipated the attack, and whether the Ranch Bowl as a business owner had reason to anticipate that patrons might be assaulted. Those are not the same inquiry under Nebraska premises-liability law.

The Nebraska Supreme Court agreed. In a December 6, 1996 opinion, the court held that a proprietor's liability for third-party violence turns on whether the attack was reasonably foreseeable to the business, not whether the victim herself saw it coming. With three fights per night at the same recurring event, the evidence plainly supported the jury's finding that the Ranch Bowl knew or should have known its guests faced a meaningful risk of assault. The court reversed the district court, reinstated the $25,000 jury verdict, and remanded with directions to enter judgment in Hulett's favor.

The case is reported at 251 Neb. 189, 556 N.W.2d 23 (1996).

Sources

This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.

More proven verdicts from Rensch and Rensch

All Rensch and Rensch proven verdicts →
$34,000VerdictCar AccidentsNE

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a $34,000 jury verdict for Terry W. Pitt, an Omaha chef who sustained a 20-to-25-percent permanent impairment to his body as a whole after a Checker Cab struck his vehicle while he was making a left turn near 22nd Street and Chandler Road in Bellevue.

1984 · Sarpy County / Nebraska Supreme CourtRead the full story →
ConfidentialMedical MalpracticeNE

The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a directed verdict for the defense in Mary Cohan's delayed breast-cancer diagnosis case, ordering a new trial against the radiology and OB/GYN providers responsible for misreading her 2009 mammogram.

2017 · Douglas County District Court / Nebraska Supreme CourtRead the full story →
ConfidentialVerdictWorkplace InjuryNE

The Nebraska Supreme Court upheld a permanent total disability award for a truck driver whose 2009 rollover on an Interstate 680 on-ramp in Omaha combined with pre-existing mental and cognitive impairments left him unable to compete in any regular branch of the labor market.

2015 · Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court / Nebraska Supreme CourtRead the full story →
ConfidentialVerdictWorkplace InjuryNE

The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a trial court ruling and held that when an employer denies a workers' compensation claim, the employee is not bound by the normal chain-of-referral rules for choosing physicians, and the employer must pay for all medical treatment later found to be compensable.

2013 · Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court / Nebraska Supreme CourtRead the full story →

Related premises liability verdicts

$1.6 billionVerdictGroup recoveryNY

Anapol Weiss shareholder Kristen Gibbons Feden helped secure $1.6 billion in default verdicts for 104 women sexually abused as children by former Long Island pediatrician Stuart Copperman, one of the largest cumulative civil awards against a single individual in U.S. history.

Anapol Weiss2025 · Nassau County Supreme Court, Long IslandRead the full story →
$1.1 billionVerdictOn appealTX

A Dallas jury awarded $1.1 billion against a trust fund heir who beat a 2-year-old into a permanent vegetative state in 2021, a verdict the firm calls the largest child-assault award in U.S. history.

The Buzbee Law Firm2026 · 134th District Court, Dallas CountyRead the full story →
$1 billionVerdictNot collectableGA

A Clayton County jury awarded $1 billion to a woman who was raped at age 14 by an armed security guard her employer hired without verifying he was licensed to carry a weapon.

Stewart Miller Simmons Trial Attorneys2018 · State Court of Clayton County, GeorgiaRead the full story →
$850 millionVerdictGroup recoveryLA

Joseph Bruno and Bruno & Bruno served as lead plaintiffs' counsel in a landmark class action brought by more than 8,000 Gentilly residents exposed to a butadiene tank-car fire in 1987, securing a jury verdict that included $2.5 billion in punitive damages against CSX Transportation alone, later reduced to $850 million on appeal and affirmed by Louisiana's Fourth Circuit.

Bruno & Bruno1997 · Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, LouisianaRead the full story →