Matthew Curtis

Senior Shareholder at Sommers Schwartz PC
Southfield, MI

Similar personal injury attorneys in Southfield

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

About Matthew Curtis

The practice of law is intellectually taxing, financially rewarding and brings a tremendous amount of satisfaction when you are able to help your client in time of need. To be honest, one of the things I enjoy most about my practice is outsmarting my opponents. My hard work and willing to put in whatever time is necessary to be fully prepared to handle anything that comes my way. Once we enter the courtroom, no one will be more prepared than I am.

Matthew Curtis is a senior shareholder and member of the Board of Directors at Sommers Schwartz, P.C. For the past 30 years, he has successfully litigated complex personal injury and medical malpractice cases throughout Michigan, and across the United States. He has successfully resolved hundreds of medical negligence cases and has been responsible for securing numerous verdicts and settlements in excess of $1,000,000 on behalf of his clients. Matt has successfully litigated cases in Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota, Georgia, and Maryland. While Matt represents clients in a broad area of personal injury and medical negligence cases, he concentrates his practice in the areas of:

Proven verdicts and settlements at Sommers Schwartz PC

These results are credited to Sommers Schwartz PC. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$10.5 millionSettlementTop 20 in Michigan · #18

A class settlement with Michigan Pain Specialists resolved claims of 311 patients and survivors of the 2012 fungal meningitis outbreak traced to contaminated steroid injections. It was reached in Livingston County Circuit Court in March 2016. The $10.5 million is a single class figure that the sources do not itemise by patient. Robert B. Sickels of Sommers Schwartz PC sat on the three-attorney plaintiffs' steering committee for Michigan.

Livingston County Circuit Court, Howell · 2016Class ActionsRead the full story →
$3.7 millionSettlement

After two federal jury verdicts found that Frankenmuth violated the Loesel family's equal-protection rights by passing a zoning ordinance designed to block a Walmart land sale, the city settled for $3.7 million in November 2014.

U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan (Bay City) · 2014Civil RightsRead the full story →
$702,469Verdict

On April 25, 2014, a Saginaw County jury returned a $1,612,269 verdict for Debra Cameron and her husband, Hugh, against family physician James V. Bodrie, M.D. The jury found he failed to pursue a cardiac workup despite months of symptoms and a chest X-ray showing an enlarged heart, and that Ms. Cameron suffered a major heart attack days later. The award included $262,268.86 in medical expenses, with the rest for non-economic damages, and the vote was 6-2. Michigan's 2014 cap on non-economic damages in malpractice cases limits that portion to $440,200, so the most that could stand was about $702,469, and no appeal was filed.

Saginaw County Circuit Court, Saginaw, Michigan · 2014Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Detroit College of Law
J.D., 1985
University of Michigan
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Michigan

Other attorneys at Sommers Schwartz PC

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Southfield firms

Fieger, Fieger, Kenney & Harrington, P.C.
Fieger, Fieger, Kenney & Harrington, P.C.
$135 million · A Botched Scoliosis Surgery, 10 Days of Delay, and a $135 Million Verdict
Mike Morse Injury Law Firm
Mike Morse Injury Law Firm
$75 Million Verdict Over MDMA Overdose Death of Denis Preka, Michigan's Largest for a Single Death
Buckfire Law
Buckfire Law
$6.4 Million Verdict After Man Dies From Untreated Alcohol Withdrawal in Kent County Jail

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.