About Erik Willer
Erik Willer has spent 16 years at TSR Injury Law helping clients navigate uncertainty with clarity and honesty. He guides clients through complex claims by empowering them to take charge of their recovery while he fights for fair treatment. His colleagues admire his approachability and broad knowledge base, including deep familiarity with medical treatments and recovery options. One case that stands out involved a client suffering from chronic pain for years.
Erik suggested she discuss a specialized treatment with her doctor, and after the procedure she told him she had forgotten what it was like not to be in pain. Known for daily joke-of-the-day emails and a genuine love of dad jokes, Erik also brings a lighthearted energy to the office. Outside of work, he and his wife are raising 15-year-old triplets and are foster pet parents for puppies and kittens. The family volunteers at local food shelters.
Proven verdicts and settlements at TSR Injury Law
These results are credited to TSR Injury Law. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Hennepin County jury awarded $6 million after a drop-in daycare at Grand Casino Mille Lacs left a three-year-old boy unsupervised for roughly 90 minutes while an older child physically and sexually assaulted him.
A 53-year-old nurse rear-ended by a semi-truck on Highway 94 suffered a mild traumatic brain injury that cut her working capacity in half, and a three-attorney arbitration panel awarded her $3,041,784 after four years of litigation.
A 91-year-old woman lost her leg in a car accident where fault was admitted immediately, but American Family Insurance delayed paying her claim for months; a Minnesota jury awarded $2.2 million after the insurer's repeated low offers.
A corporate executive and mother of two suffered a traumatic brain injury when an underinsured driver T-boned her car; her own insurer, Acuity, offered $250,000 against a $1.5 million policy, and a Minnesota jury returned a $2.1 million verdict.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
