About Aria Pham
Aria Pham has spent 11 years at TSR Injury Law building her practice on one guiding principle: knowledge is power. She gives clients all the information they need to make confident decisions, without pressure or uncertainty, saying it is their case and their life and her job is to make sure they have everything they need. Her approach is intensely personal; she stays in close contact with clients from start to finish, focuses on negotiating fair settlements, and ensures clients receive the medical care they need before closing a case.
One case took over five years to resolve. Her client, a young woman with an incurable pain condition caused by an accident, needed lifelong medical support, and Aria refused to settle until she knew the client would be taken care of for life. Aria's path to law was shaped by her work at an Asian women's domestic violence shelter, where she helped women facing immigration and family law issues, sparking her desire to advocate for those who need it most.
Proven verdicts and settlements at TSR Injury Law
These results are credited to TSR Injury Law. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Hennepin County jury awarded $6 million after a drop-in daycare at Grand Casino Mille Lacs left a three-year-old boy unsupervised for roughly 90 minutes while an older child physically and sexually assaulted him.
A 53-year-old nurse rear-ended by a semi-truck on Highway 94 suffered a mild traumatic brain injury that cut her working capacity in half, and a three-attorney arbitration panel awarded her $3,041,784 after four years of litigation.
A 91-year-old woman lost her leg in a car accident where fault was admitted immediately, but American Family Insurance delayed paying her claim for months; a Minnesota jury awarded $2.2 million after the insurer's repeated low offers.
A corporate executive and mother of two suffered a traumatic brain injury when an underinsured driver T-boned her car; her own insurer, Acuity, offered $250,000 against a $1.5 million policy, and a Minnesota jury returned a $2.1 million verdict.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
