About Chuck Slane
Chuck Slane brings more than 25 years of personal injury experience to TSR Injury Law. He has a reputation as one of the most prepared and analytical lawyers his colleagues have worked with, described by a litigation paralegal as a bulldog when it comes to preparedness. Chuck understands that for most clients a personal injury case is their one chance at justice, so he takes time to explain every step, answer difficult questions, and ensure clients feel confident.
His path to law started with a high school guidance counselor's suggestion to begin as a paralegal, which led to an internship with a personal injury attorney and eventually law school. He now mentors young lawyers through the Minnesota Association for Justice's Trial College. Outside of work, Chuck walks his dogs, supports local restaurants, and travels with his wife Traci to concerts, including a Led Zeppelin tribute show at Red Rocks.
Proven verdicts and settlements at TSR Injury Law
These results are credited to TSR Injury Law. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Hennepin County jury awarded $6 million after a drop-in daycare at Grand Casino Mille Lacs left a three-year-old boy unsupervised for roughly 90 minutes while an older child physically and sexually assaulted him.
A 53-year-old nurse rear-ended by a semi-truck on Highway 94 suffered a mild traumatic brain injury that cut her working capacity in half, and a three-attorney arbitration panel awarded her $3,041,784 after four years of litigation.
A 91-year-old woman lost her leg in a car accident where fault was admitted immediately, but American Family Insurance delayed paying her claim for months; a Minnesota jury awarded $2.2 million after the insurer's repeated low offers.
A corporate executive and mother of two suffered a traumatic brain injury when an underinsured driver T-boned her car; her own insurer, Acuity, offered $250,000 against a $1.5 million policy, and a Minnesota jury returned a $2.1 million verdict.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
