Rudy Westmoreland
About Rudy Westmoreland
Rudy Westmoreland has served as managing partner of Westmoreland Vesper Quattrone and Beers since 1988. With over 45 years of legal experience, he handles commercial litigation, corporate matters, real estate, and banking, and negotiates many of the firm's largest and most complex personal injury and wrongful death matters. He has appeared before the United States Supreme Court, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on multiple occasions, and the New Jersey Supreme Court.
He obtained what was described as the single largest CAFRA permit ever issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and settled a case against Columbia Gas for over two million dollars. He is a founding director of Mainland Bank and of American Suburban Title Company, and has served as solicitor for Carnegie Bank, Bank of New York, First American Title Insurance Company, and National Community Bank. He is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Westmoreland Vesper Quattrone & Beers, P.A.
These results are credited to Westmoreland Vesper Quattrone & Beers, P.A.. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A federal judge in Camden, New Jersey, found a Connecticut boater primarily responsible for a 2007 waverunner collision off Wildwood that broke a 14-year-old passenger's leg. After a bench trial on liability, Judge Joseph E. Irenas of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that watercraft operator Marc M. Roy, Jr. was 80 percent at fault and fellow operator George R. Djukanovic, Jr. was 20 percent at fault, while finding the rental company, Lucky Fin Water Sports, LLC, not negligent. The case ended in a $1,350,000 judgment reported in June 2012. The court's opinion lists Westmoreland Vesper & Quattrone, P.A., by Thomas J. Vesper, as counsel for the plaintiff. Roy never answered the lawsuit or appeared in court, and the injured boy's father said the judgment was probably uncollectible.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
