Similar personal injury attorneys in Oklahoma City
Chris Hammons
Laird Hammons Laird
2 Proven Verdicts
Jason Hicks
Hicks Law Firm
2 Proven Verdicts
T. Luke Abel
Abel Law Firm
1 Proven Verdict
Kelly Bishop
Abel Law Firm
1 Proven Verdict
Simone Fulmer Gaus
Fulmer Sill
1 Proven Verdict
Travis Leverett
Parrish DeVaughn Injury Lawyers
1 Proven Verdict
Harrison Lujan
Fulmer Sill
1 Proven Verdict
Noble McIntyre
McIntyre Law P.C.
1 Proven Verdict
Jacob Rowe
Fulmer Sill
1 Proven Verdict
Andrea Rust
Fulmer Sill
1 Proven VerdictPrior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Scott Porter
Scott Porter is an attorney at Cain Law in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, where he focuses on personal injury litigation representing individuals injured due to negligence. A native Oklahoman who grew up in Edmond, he started at the firm as a legal intern in 2023 before becoming an attorney in 2025.
Porter earned his J.D. from the University of Oklahoma College of Law in 2025 and a Bachelor's degree and Master's degree in History from the University of Central Oklahoma. He was admitted to the Oklahoma bar in July 2025.
Practice areas
Education
University of Oklahoma College of Law
B.A. History; M.A. History, 2025
University of Central Oklahoma
Undergraduate
Bar admissions & credentials
State Bar of Oklahoma, admitted 2025
Other attorneys at Cain Law
View firm →
Proven verdicts and settlements from other Oklahoma City firms
Abel Law Firm
$15 million · Oklahoma Supreme Court Restores Abel Law Firm's $15 Million Crane Verdict and Strikes the State's Damages Cap
Fulmer Sill
Oklahoma Supreme Court: UM Coverage Follows the Insured, Not the Vehicle
Hicks Law Firm
$90.13 million · $126 Million Verdict for a Teen Hit by an Off-Duty Police Sergeant, $90.1 Million Judgment Stands
Laird Hammons Laird
$90.13 million · $126 Million Verdict for a Teen Hit by an Off-Duty Police Sergeant, $90.1 Million Judgment Stands
McIntyre Law P.C.
$15 Million Judgment After Five Pit Bulls Kill Oklahoma City Man
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.