About Francisco Yeverino
Francisco Yeverino is an associate at Greene Broillet & Wheeler with experience handling personal injury cases involving trucking, transportation, general liability, and traumatic brain injuries. He attended Texas State University, earning a B.F.A. in Theatre Performance and Production with a minor in Business (summa cum laude). He attended Southwestern Law School, where he earned his J.D. and was a national champion of the 2021 All-Star National Bracket Challenge in Trial Advocacy, as well as an ABOTA Fellow for the 2022 Hon. Victor E. Chavez fellowship. He is Vice Chair of CAALA's 2026 Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee and a member of the American Trucking Association. He is also admitted to the San Manuel Tribal Court.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Greene Broillet & Wheeler
These results are credited to Greene Broillet & Wheeler. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
Acting as outside trial counsel for Los Angeles County, the firm then known as Greene, Broillet, Taylor, Wheeler and Panish helped recover approximately $3.3 billion for the county through the 1998 nationwide Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
A Los Angeles jury ordered General Motors to pay $4.9 billion after a 1979 Chevrolet Malibu's rear-mounted fuel tank ruptured and burned six occupants in a rear-end crash, the largest US personal-injury verdict at the time.
A Sacramento jury awarded $73 million, including $50 million in punitive damages, after a Goodyear tire tread separation caused a Ford E-350 church van to flip four times on I-5, killing two passengers and injuring two others.
A Los Angeles jury awarded $58,137,361 to a construction worker who suffered third-degree burns over 75 percent of his body when a defective O-ring on a Caterpillar scraper caused flammable hydraulic fluid to spray onto a hot engine, producing what was then the largest single-plaintiff personal-injury verdict in California history.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.