Edwin Essakhar

Los Angeles, CA14 years experienceAdmitted 2012

About Edwin Essakhar

Edwin Essakhar is co-founder and lead trial counsel at Hillstone Law Accident & Injury Attorneys, focusing on personal injury litigation. Licensed in California since 2012, he previously represented insurance companies before transitioning to plaintiff-side representation. While in law school, he was part of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine.

Practice areas

Education

Pepperdine University School of Law
J.D., 2012
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Undergraduate, 2008

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of California, admitted 2012
State Bar of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
State Bar of U.S. District Court Central District of California
State Bar of U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
State Bar of U.S. District Court Southern District of California
State Bar of U.S. District Court Northern District of California
American Bar Association
Los Angeles County Bar Association
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

Awards & recognition

Super Lawyers Rising Stars (Southern California)
Top 30 Breach of Contract Verdicts in California (2017)

Other attorneys at Hillstone Law Accident & Injury Attorneys

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Los Angeles firms

Panish Shea Ravipudi LLP
Panish Shea Ravipudi LLP
$1.2 billion · $4.9 Billion Verdict Over Chevy Malibu Fuel Tank Fire
Taylor & Ring, LLP
Taylor & Ring, LLP
$47.41 million · Road Rage Chase That Killed Torrance Teen Ends in $61.7 Million Jury Verdict
McGee Lerer Ogrin
McGee Lerer Ogrin
$122.5 Million Settlement for 124 Survivors of Police Activities League Volunteer Eric Uller
West Coast Trial Lawyers
West Coast Trial Lawyers
$13.1 million · Federal Jury Awards $13.1 Million to Parents of Man Shot in the Back by Riverside County Deputy
Wilshire Law Firm
Wilshire Law Firm
$35.3 Million Verdict for 81-Year-Old Backseat Passenger Rear-Ended by Tractor-Trailer on the 10 Freeway

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.