About Lawrence P. Wilson

Lawrence (Larry) Wilson rejoined The Lanier Law Firm in 2003 and is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He has tried approximately 38 jury trials to verdict and is among the most experienced trial attorneys at the firm. Mr. Wilson practices in the areas of 18-wheeler accidents , chemical plant explosions and toxic releases, product liability , FELA/railroad claims , and medical malpractice . Mr. Wilson has also helped clients in numerous jury verdicts involving sexual assault, age discrimination, premises liability, automobile negligence and Jones Act and maritime negligence .

He is known for his innovative trial themes and strategic approach to damages presentation. Larry Wilson is a native of Lubbock, Texas. Mr. Wilson began his legal career at the law firm Fulbright & Jaworski and later was a name partner with Goforth Lewis Sanford Wilson, LLP. He and his wife, Susan, live in Houston, Texas, and attend the Church of Christ in Champions.

Proven verdicts and settlements at The Lanier Law Firm

These results are credited to The Lanier Law Firm. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

A St. Louis jury in July 2018 awarded 22 women and their families $4.69 billion, the largest U.S. verdict of that year, finding that asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer; a Missouri appellate court upheld $2.11 billion in 2020.

Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri · 2018Product LiabilityRead the full story →

After a six-week federal trial, a jury found three of the nation's largest retail pharmacy chains created a public nuisance by flooding Lake and Trumbull Counties, Ohio with opioid pills, and a judge ordered $650 million to fund a 15-year abatement plan.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland (MDL 2804) · 2021Product LiabilityRead the full story →

A Dallas federal jury awarded $1.04 billion to six California patients harmed by Johnson and Johnson's metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip implants, with W. Mark Lanier leading an eight-week trial that produced one of the largest product-liability verdicts of 2016.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas (MDL 2244) · 2016Product LiabilityRead the full story →

Hours before opening arguments in the first federal opioid bellwether trial, Cuyahoga and Summit counties in Ohio secured a $260 million settlement from distributors AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson, plus manufacturer Teva.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland (MDL 2804) · 2019Product LiabilityRead the full story →

A Dallas federal jury awarded six New York patients $247 million against Johnson and Johnson and its DePuy unit, finding that the metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip implant system was defectively designed and that the company concealed known risks from patients and surgeons.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas (MDL 2244) · 2017Product LiabilityRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

University of Texas School of Law
J.D.
Lubbock Christian College
Undergraduate

Other attorneys at The Lanier Law Firm

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Houston firms

The Buzbee Law Firm
The Buzbee Law Firm
$1.1 Billion Verdict for Child Left Brain-Damaged by Oil-Fortune Heir
Arnold & Itkin
Arnold & Itkin
$2.07 billion · Cobb County Jury Awards John Barnes $2.065 Billion in Roundup Cancer Trial
Williams Hart & Boundas
Williams Hart & Boundas
$15.3 billion · Texas Recovers $15.3 Billion From Tobacco Industry in Landmark 1998 Settlement
The Ammons Law Firm LLP
The Ammons Law Firm LLP
$812 Million Verdict for Family of Worker Killed in Pecos Chemical Plant Explosion, Part of $1.6 Billion
Abraham Watkins
Abraham Watkins
$28.59 million · Jury Finds ExxonMobil 100% Liable for Baytown Plant Explosion, Awards Five Workers $28.59 Million

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.