First Jury Verdict Against Coloplast for NovaSilk Mesh: $2.5 Million for Virginia Redding
Won by The Maher Law Firm (co-counsel) and Wagstaff & Cartmell.
An Orlando federal jury awarded Virginia Redding $2.5 million after finding that Coloplast's NovaSilk pelvic organ prolapse mesh was defectively designed and that the company had concealed known risks from her physician, in what was the first jury verdict against Coloplast for that specific device.
What happened
In December 2009, Virginia Redding underwent surgery to address pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Her surgeon implanted two Coloplast devices: a Supris mid-urethral sling and a NovaSilk pelvic organ prolapse mesh. Both were made from polypropylene, a material Redding's legal team would later argue is biologically incompatible with human tissue and triggers a chronic inflammatory response when placed permanently inside the body.
Redding's recovery did not go as expected. She developed mesh erosion, vaginal infection and bleeding, bladder problems, and persistent pelvic pain. Only partial removal of the mesh proved possible, as the polypropylene had integrated into surrounding tissue. The complications were lasting.
The case was initially part of a pelvic mesh multidistrict litigation in West Virginia. After Redding rejected Coloplast's settlement offer, her case was transferred to the Middle District of Florida for a standalone trial in Orlando. The two-week trial pitted her attorneys from Wagstaff & Cartmell and the Maher Law Firm against Coloplast's defense team from King & Spalding.
The jury cleared Coloplast on the Supris sling, finding no design defect and no failure to warn as to that device. On the NovaSilk mesh, however, the verdict went fully against Coloplast. Jurors found the mesh had a design defect, that Coloplast had failed to adequately warn Redding's physician of its risks, that Coloplast made negligent misrepresentations about the product, and that the company had fraudulently concealed material information. On April 26, 2022, the jury awarded Redding $2.5 million.
Coloplast appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, raising a statute of limitations argument: the company contended that Redding knew or should have known about a compensable injury linked to its mesh before September 18, 2010, which would have placed her lawsuit outside Florida's four-year window. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed. In a June 20, 2024 opinion, the court held that post-surgical symptoms in the months after implant were not sufficiently distinct from ordinary recovery to have put Redding on notice of a products liability claim. The $2.5 million judgment was affirmed in full.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.Law360: Coloplast hit with $2.5M verdict in pelvic mesh trial
- 2.FindLaw / 11th Circuit: Redding v. Coloplast Corp., No. 22-13218 (11th Cir. 2024)·Archived copy
- 3.HarrisMartin Publishing: Fla. Jury Hands Down $2.5 Million Verdict in Coloplast Pelvic Mesh Action·Archived copy
- 4.HarrisMartin Publishing: 11th Cir. Upholds $2.5 Million Verdict in Coloplast Pelvic Mesh Action·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from Wagstaff & Cartmell
All Wagstaff & Cartmell proven verdicts →San Francisco Unified School District's case was the first JUUL bellwether trial against Altria; after the plaintiffs rested, Altria agreed to pay $235 million to resolve roughly 6,000 pending e-vapor claims nationwide.
A federal jury in Hammond, Indiana found that Ethicon's Prolift transvaginal mesh was defectively designed and inadequately warned against, awarding Barbara and Anton Kaiser $35 million. A judge reduced the punitive damages, leaving a $20 million verdict that the Seventh Circuit affirmed in full in 2020.
Kathryn Gant died at the scene of a head-on crash on K-58 in Kansas on June 10, 2011, after a driver crossed the center line in a no-passing zone. Her husband sued the driver, the driver's parents and the family oil company. After a five-day bench trial in June 2015, a Coffey County judge found all of them liable and awarded $6,723,021. Under a pretrial agreement, none of the judgment could be collected from the defendants themselves.
A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google's YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young woman identified as K.G.M., who began watching YouTube at age 6 and joined Instagram at 9. On March 25, 2026, it awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, split 70 percent to Meta and 30 percent to YouTube, plus $3 million in punitive damages. It was the first bellwether trial in the coordinated California social media addiction cases.
Related product liability verdicts
Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.
C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.
As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.
After fifteen years of litigation and three failed bankruptcy maneuvers by Johnson and Johnson subsidiaries, Ashcraft and Gerel attorneys R. Bryant McCulley and Michelle Parfitt helped negotiate a global, uncapped settlement of at least $5.5 billion covering approximately 76,000 ovarian-cancer claims.