Altria Pays $235 Million After San Francisco Schools Rest Their Case in First JUUL Bellwether Trial
Won by Girard Sharp (firm per Law.com, not stated in order) (co-lead counsel), Keller Rohrback (firm per Law.com, not stated in order) (co-lead counsel), Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein (firm per Law.com, not stated in order) (co-lead counsel), Weitz & Luxenberg (co-lead counsel), Wagstaff & Cartmell (liaison counsel), Walkup Personal Injury Lawyers (liaison counsel), Beasley Allen (steering committee), Goza & Honnold (steering committee) and 1 other firm.
San Francisco Unified School District's case was the first JUUL bellwether trial against Altria; after the plaintiffs rested, Altria agreed to pay $235 million to resolve roughly 6,000 pending e-vapor claims nationwide.
What happened
For years, school administrators and staff across San Francisco watched vaping spread through their campuses. The San Francisco Unified School District filed suit against Juul Labs and, separately, against Altria Group, the tobacco conglomerate that poured $13 billion into Juul in 2018 and held a 35 percent stake. The district alleged that Altria was not a passive investor: it had conspired with Juul to develop and market sweet, flavored nicotine products that were deliberately calibrated to attract teenagers.
The case against Juul was resolved in December 2022 as part of a broader $1.7 billion global settlement reached on the eve of trial. The Altria case was a different fight. The cases were consolidated as MDL No. 2913 before U.S. District Judge William Orrick, who named Sarah London, Dean Kawamoto, Ellen Relkin and Dena Sharp co-lead counsel and Thomas Cartmell of Wagstaff & Cartmell Plaintiffs' Government Entity Liaison Counsel, with a 14-lawyer steering committee. Cartmell tried the school district's case, and SFUSD's claims were selected as the first bellwether trial in the MDL, a test case that would signal how juries viewed Altria's culpability across thousands of pending claims.
Trial began on April 24, 2023, in federal court in San Francisco. In opening statements, Cartmell told the jury that Altria was 'at the heart' of Juul's youth-targeting strategy, pointing to the company's investment in sweet flavors and aggressive advertising that lit up social media. Altria's defense team argued the company had aimed to steer adult cigarette smokers toward a less harmful alternative and that Juul sales had actually declined after Altria's involvement. The district presented evidence that school staff had devoted significant time and resources to managing vaping incidents and the health consequences of student nicotine addiction.
After plaintiffs rested their case, Altria agreed to settle. On May 10, 2023, the company announced a $235 million resolution covering approximately 6,000 pending e-vapor lawsuits from school districts, government entities, Native American tribes, and individuals nationwide, claims in which Wagstaff & Cartmell represented hundreds of school districts, including some of the largest in the country. Combined with the earlier Juul settlement, the total recovery across the MDL reached just under $2 billion.
The $235 million settlement closed the Altria phase of the litigation without a jury verdict on liability.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
- 1.In re JUUL Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2913, Order Appointing Plaintiffs' Leadership and Steering Committee Members, Dkt. 341 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2019) (Judge Orrick)
- 2.Tobacco Reporter: Altria's Juul trial begins (Apr. 25, 2023)·Archived copy
- 3.CBS News San Francisco: SFUSD settles federal lawsuit against Juul·Archived copy
- 4.WSFA 12 News: Montgomery law firm reaches settlement with e-cigarette marketer (May 16, 2023)·Archived copy
More proven verdicts from Wagstaff & Cartmell
All Wagstaff & Cartmell proven verdicts →A federal jury in Hammond, Indiana found that Ethicon's Prolift transvaginal mesh was defectively designed and inadequately warned against, awarding Barbara and Anton Kaiser $35 million. A judge reduced the punitive damages, leaving a $20 million verdict that the Seventh Circuit affirmed in full in 2020.
Kathryn Gant died at the scene of a head-on crash on K-58 in Kansas on June 10, 2011, after a driver crossed the center line in a no-passing zone. Her husband sued the driver, the driver's parents and the family oil company. After a five-day bench trial in June 2015, a Coffey County judge found all of them liable and awarded $6,723,021. Under a pretrial agreement, none of the judgment could be collected from the defendants themselves.
A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google's YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young woman identified as K.G.M., who began watching YouTube at age 6 and joined Instagram at 9. On March 25, 2026, it awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, split 70 percent to Meta and 30 percent to YouTube, plus $3 million in punitive damages. It was the first bellwether trial in the coordinated California social media addiction cases.
A Kern County jury handed Coleen Perry a $5.7 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon unit on March 5, 2015, in the first trial ever to reach a jury over Ethicon's TVT-Abbrevo polypropylene mesh sling.
Related product liability verdicts
Sullivan Papain was among the firms representing New York State against Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard, securing a $25 billion recovery through the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement.
C. Steven Yerrid, the youngest of Florida's 11-lawyer 'Dream Team,' added racketeering and conspiracy charges that tripled the damages ceiling, helping the state secure what was then the largest civil settlement in American history against the tobacco industry.
As co-lead counsel in the federal Roundup multidistrict litigation and the first firm to sue Monsanto in 2015, Weitz and Luxenberg helped negotiate a $10.9 billion settlement resolving approximately 125,000 non-Hodgkin lymphoma claims against Bayer-owned Monsanto.
After fifteen years of litigation and three failed bankruptcy maneuvers by Johnson and Johnson subsidiaries, Ashcraft and Gerel attorneys R. Bryant McCulley and Michelle Parfitt helped negotiate a global, uncapped settlement of at least $5.5 billion covering approximately 76,000 ovarian-cancer claims.