About Breana Bell

Breana Bell is an Associate Attorney at Wingfield, Ginsburg & Lipp, P.C., a Washington, D.C. personal injury firm serving clients across DC, Maryland, and Virginia. She earned her Juris Doctor from Regent University School of Law (2015-2018), where she served as Chairwoman of the Moot Court Board and competed in moot court competitions. Prior to law school, Breana pursued a diverse academic path, obtaining undergraduate degrees in both pre-law and theater, with experience in acting, directing, and musical theater that cultivated strong communication and interpersonal skills. Her prior legal experience includes positions as an estate planning and administration attorney handling probate, guardianship, and conservatorship matters, and roles at firms including Kondori Moorad & Niesen, Alperin Law, Conrod & Company Law Firm, Shupert Chaing, and Gibbs & Associates Law Firm.

Practice areas

Education

Regent University School of Law
JD, 2018

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Connecticut
Chairwoman, Moot Court Board (Regent University School of Law)

Other attorneys at Wingfield, Ginsburg & Lipp, PC

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Washington firms

Regan Zambri Long Personal Injury Lawyers
Regan Zambri Long Personal Injury Lawyers
$6.17 Million Verdict for Skier Brain-Injured in Fall Off Unmarked Drop-Off at Massanutten Ski Resort
Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP
Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP
$5.5 billion · J&J Agrees to Pay at Least $5.5 Billion to Resolve 76,000 Talc-Cancer Claims
Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP
Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP
$20 Million Judgment Against U.S. for Driver Paralyzed When Smithsonian Bus Ran Red Light
Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C.
Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C.
$17.11 million · $17.1 Million Verdict After Missed Ectopic Pregnancy Kills Young DC Mother
Koonz McKenney Johnson & DePaolis LLP
Koonz McKenney Johnson & DePaolis LLP
$13.5 Million Default Judgment Against Iran for Passenger Tortured in 1984 Kuwait Airways Hijacking

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.