Similar personal injury attorneys in Houston
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Ryan Fischbeck
Ryan Fischbeck is an attorney at Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP who brings a uniquely diverse background to personal injury law. A U.S. Army veteran with an honorable discharge, Fischbeck formerly held a Top Secret security clearance and worked as a certified optician before pursuing academia and then law.
Before entering law school, Fischbeck spent over seven years as an educator at Bowling Green State University in Ohio, where he designed and independently taught courses in Philosophy and Political Science while pursuing his PhD in Applied Philosophy. He earned his J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center, where he received the Excellence in Oral Advocacy award and was inducted into the Order of the Barristers. He also holds an M.A. in Philosophy and a B.A. in Philosophy (magna cum laude, Dean's List) from the University of Houston.
At Armstrong Lee & Baker, Fischbeck represents injured clients with dedication and rigor, drawing on his extensive experience in legal research, drafting motions and petitions, and coordinating complex cases.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Armstrong Lee & Baker
These results are credited to Armstrong Lee & Baker. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Texas appeals court affirmed a $4.5 million jury award for Jerry Thomas, an East Texas man who lost his hand at a sawmill in Rusk, holding that the owner never established an employment relationship and could not invoke the workers' compensation exclusive-remedy defense.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Awards & recognition
Other attorneys at Armstrong Lee & Baker
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Houston firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









