Similar personal injury attorneys in Honolulu
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Rafael Renteria
Rafael Renteria has dedicated his legal career to helping others. As a domestic violence prosecutor for the City and County of Honolulu, he advocated on behalf of victims of child abuse, romantic partner abuse, and murder. His goal is to give a voice to the voiceless, which led him to work within the court system to improve the treatment of victims in the criminal justice system.
As a supervisor in the prosecutor's office, he mentored and trained a team of trial attorneys. Since joining Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner, Rafael has turned his attention to seeking civil justice on behalf of those who have been seriously injured. He is a 2009 graduate of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, William S. Richardson School of Law.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner
These results are credited to Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
Leavitt, Yamane and Soldner represented Maui wildfire survivors and victims' families in the $4.037 billion global settlement resolving approximately 450 lawsuits arising from the August 2023 Lahaina fire.
A Hawaii jury awarded $12.1 million to a Waipahu family after labor-induction negligence at Kapiolani Medical Center cut off a newborn's oxygen for 26 minutes, causing permanent brain damage and cerebral palsy.
A 38-year-old man paralyzed at a Waipio crosswalk in April 2015 settled for $11.4 million after attorney Woodruff Soldner proved the City of Honolulu repaved the road in 2014 without completing the safety checklist its own laws required.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner
View firm →
Proven verdicts and settlements from other Honolulu firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.