Similar personal injury attorneys in Honolulu
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Woody Soldner
Since 1985, Woody Soldner has been committed to obtaining maximum compensation for those injured in Hawaii due to the actions of others. He is particularly focused on clients with catastrophic injuries, including spinal cord injuries, brain injuries, and burns, often resulting from car accidents, pedestrian accidents, medical malpractice, defective products, construction accidents, and fires. He and his team understand the complex, lifetime consequences of a catastrophic injury or wrongful death and are persistent in securing a better future for clients and their families. More than 50 of his past cases have involved verdicts or settlements exceeding $1 million, and four cases have exceeded $10 million.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner
These results are credited to Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
Leavitt, Yamane and Soldner represented Maui wildfire survivors and victims' families in the $4.037 billion global settlement resolving approximately 450 lawsuits arising from the August 2023 Lahaina fire.
A Hawaii jury awarded $12.1 million to a Waipahu family after labor-induction negligence at Kapiolani Medical Center cut off a newborn's oxygen for 26 minutes, causing permanent brain damage and cerebral palsy.
A 38-year-old man paralyzed at a Waipio crosswalk in April 2015 settled for $11.4 million after attorney Woodruff Soldner proved the City of Honolulu repaved the road in 2014 without completing the safety checklist its own laws required.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Leavitt, Yamane & Soldner
View firm →
Proven verdicts and settlements from other Honolulu firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.