Similar personal injury attorneys in New York
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Timothy Norton
Timothy Norton is Appellate Counsel at Shulman & Hill, bringing a decade of experience in appellate advocacy across all New York State Appellate Courts. While he has extensive experience in all facets of personal injury, his primary focus is on construction site accidents and New York State Labor Law. A Long Island native, he is passionate about representing injured workers and holding corporations accountable for unsafe working conditions.
Practice areas
Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Juris Doctor (J.D.)
Binghamton University
Undergraduate
Bar admissions & credentials
State Bar of New York
Awards & recognition
Magna cum laude, Syracuse University College of Law
Summa cum laude, Binghamton University
Law Review Editor, Syracuse University College of Law
Other attorneys at Shulman & Hill
View firm →Alex Shulman
Founding Partner and General Counsel
JJ Hill
Founding Partner
Noah Passer
Managing Partner
Cary London
Senior Partner Trial Attorney
Michael Kusz
Partner
Michael Pecorella
Associate Attorney
Benjamin Rabinowitz
Senior Associate Attorney
Edward Robinson
Associate Attorney
David Schleider
Partner
Petroula Thomas
Associate Attorney
Proven verdicts and settlements from other New York firms
Weitz & Luxenberg
$10.9 billion · Weitz and Luxenberg Helps Win $10.9 Billion Roundup Settlement for 125,000 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claimants
Levy Konigsberg LLP
$43.1 Million Verdict Against R.J. Reynolds for Brake Mechanic's Lung Cancer From Menthol and Asbestos
Kramer Dillof Livingston & Moore
$265 million · The Amtrak 188 Derailment and the $265 Million Fund for Its Victims
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
$272.5 Million for the Victims of the Tribeca Crane Collapse
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP
$34 million · Jury Awards $34 Million After Prempro Hormone Therapy Causes Breast Cancer and Double Mastectomy
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









