Bob Blakemore

Proven Verdicts
Attorney at Smolen & Roytman
Tulsa, OK

Similar personal injury attorneys in Tulsa

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

About Bob Blakemore

Bob Blakemore has well over fifteen years of litigation experience. Bob has devoted his career to protecting the rights of his clients, often against powerful governmental and corporate entities. Over the years, Mr. Blakemore has been involved in several notable and well-publicized civil rights class action cases, including Johnson v. City of Tulsa (the “Black Officers Case”) and Homeward Bound, Inc. v. Hissom Memorial Center. In 2011, Mr. Blakemore had the honor of drafting the amicus brief, filed on behalf of the American Medical Association, in the United States Supreme Court case Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1204 (2012).

More recently, Mr. Blakemore has focused his practice on multiple cases involving the deaths and assaults of inmates housed in county jails, including Burke v. Glanz (the “Elliott Williams case”), Henderson v. Glanz, 813 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2015), Poore v. Glanz, 46 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (N.D. Okla. 2014), Revilla v. Glanz, 8 F. Supp. 3d 1336 (N.D. Okla. 2014) and Sanders v. Glanz, 138 F. Supp. 3d 1248 (N.D. Okla. 2015).

Mr. Blakemore also represents the Estate of Eric Harris in a nationally publicized excessive use of force case involving the shooting death of Mr. Harris at the hands of Bob Bates, a former Reserve Deputy with the Tulsa County Sheriff's Office.

Mr. Blakemore has extensive environmental law experience. He was an integral member of the State of Oklahoma's litigation team in the environmental case Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (the “Oklahoma Poultry Litigation”). Mr. Blakemore also acts as outside environmental counsel for major oil and gas corporations. He has significant appellate experience, having managed multiple successful appeals in federal and state appellate courts.

Bob graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Oklahoma and his Juris Doctor from the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Bob was a member of the Phi Delta Phi fraternity, was on the Dean's Honor Roll and attended the Oxford University Summer Program at Queen's College in 1998. Bob is a member of the Oklahoma Bar Association.

Proven verdicts and settlements

$33 millionVerdictTop 10 in Oklahoma · #2

Terral Ellis II, 26, walked into the Ottawa County Jail voluntarily on an outstanding warrant. He developed bronchopneumonia and spent twelve days asking for medical care for seizures, sweating and pain. Jail video captured staff and the jail nurse mocking him. He died of septic shock on October 22, 2015.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma (affirmed in full, 10th Cir. 2026) · 2023Civil RightsRead the full story →
$10.25 millionVerdictTop 10 in Oklahoma · #5

Elliott Earl Williams, 37, was arrested in Owasso on an obstruction complaint in October 2011. Shortly after booking at the Tulsa County Jail he suffered a severe neck injury that paralysed him from the chest down. He was left on the floor of a medical-unit cell, unable to move, for days, and died of complications of the untreated injury and dehydration.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma (affirmed in relevant part, 10th Cir.; settled and paid 2019) · 2019Civil RightsRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

University of Oklahoma College of Law
J.D.
University of Oklahoma
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Oklahoma

Other attorneys at Smolen & Roytman

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Tulsa firms

Carr & Carr Injury Attorneys
Carr & Carr Injury Attorneys
$2 Million Verdict Against Church That Hid Daycare Worker's Abuse History
Bradley & Loggin, PLLC
Bradley & Loggin, PLLC
$17.5 Million Verdict for Patient Whose Surgeon Cut a Femoral Nerve During Hernia Mesh Removal

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.