Similar personal injury attorneys in Jacksonville
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Dana Brooks
Dana Brooks, Esq. is a name partner at Fasig | Brooks Law Offices, where she represents personal injury clients across Florida. She brings an extensive background in social work, mediation, and law to her practice, emphasizing client-centered advocacy.
Before practicing law, Brooks worked as a paralegal, counselor, and mediator, accumulating more than 25 years of combined professional experience. She has been admitted to the Florida Bar since 2007 and has built a reputation for high-stakes results, including a $5,459,008 gross verdict.
Brooks earned her J.D. magna cum laude from Florida State University College of Law in December 2007, where she was inducted into the Order of the Coif (top 10% of class). She also earned an M.S. in Social Work from Florida State University in 2003 and a B.S. in Social Work cum laude from Florida State University. She is admitted to the Florida Bar.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Fasig Brooks Law Offices
These results are credited to Fasig Brooks Law Offices. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Gadsden County jury awarded James Simmons $5,459,008 after a grinding wheel shattered and left him permanently blind, finding the tool's owner liable for concealing a prior blade failure and removing the grinder's safety guard.
Jimmy Fasig won a $5 million jury verdict for the father of a woman killed in a crash near a Flying J travel center, but the award was wiped out on appeal after the father died while post-trial motions were still pending.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Awards & recognition
Other attorneys at Fasig Brooks Law Offices
View firm →
Proven verdicts and settlements from other Jacksonville firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.