Similar personal injury attorneys in Jacksonville
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Ryan Molaghan
Ryan P. Molaghan, Esq. is a civil litigator and trial attorney at Fasig | Brooks Law Offices, where he represents injured clients in matters involving wrongful death, car crashes, motorcycle accidents, trucking collisions, premises liability, negligent security, and medical and dental malpractice. He joined Fasig | Brooks to expand the firm's presence in Georgia.
Molaghan has recovered millions of dollars for clients and was recognized by TopVerdict.com for obtaining one of the Top 100 Jury Verdicts for civil rights violations in the United States (2022). He was also named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 list and is a member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum.
He earned his Juris Doctorate from Florida State University College of Law in 2015. He is admitted to the Florida and Georgia Bars, including all federal and state courts in those jurisdictions.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Fasig Brooks Law Offices
These results are credited to Fasig Brooks Law Offices. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Gadsden County jury awarded James Simmons $5,459,008 after a grinding wheel shattered and left him permanently blind, finding the tool's owner liable for concealing a prior blade failure and removing the grinder's safety guard.
Jimmy Fasig won a $5 million jury verdict for the father of a woman killed in a crash near a Flying J travel center, but the award was wiped out on appeal after the father died while post-trial motions were still pending.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Awards & recognition
Other attorneys at Fasig Brooks Law Offices
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Jacksonville firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









