Similar personal injury attorneys in Chicago
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Matthew Scoles
Matthew C. Scoles is an Associate Attorney at Malman Law in Chicago, bringing extensive experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants in personal injury litigation. Licensed in Illinois since 2017, Matt is widely recognized for his tireless work ethic, sharp advocacy, and unwavering commitment to client care. Over the course of his career, he has handled more than 1,500 arbitrations and secured over 60 jury trial verdicts across Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties, and has successfully negotiated millions of dollars in settlements for his clients. Born and raised in Canton, Ohio, Matt earned his B.A. in Psychology before working in a variety of fields, including supporting adults with developmental disabilities. He moved to Chicago to pursue his J.D. at The John Marshall Law School, where he was active in the Fair Housing Clinic and competed in the National Veterans Moot Court Competition in Washington, D.C.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Malman Law
These results are credited to Malman Law. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Cook County jury awarded $5.5 million to the family of Sandy Brooks, an 85-year-old dialysis patient who died after a Richton Park nursing home sent him to none of his scheduled treatments, tying the largest nursing home neglect verdict in county history.
A Cook County jury awarded $5.5 million to the family of Bettye Patterson, 80, who struggled to breathe for about 20 minutes after a power outage shut off her supplemental oxygen at a Palos Heights nursing home.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Malman Law
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Chicago firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









