Nebraska Appeals Court Rules Closely Held Corporation Owners Can Sue Company's Lawyers for Malpractice
Won by Rensch and Rensch.
Rensch and Rensch won reversal of summary judgment in a legal malpractice case, establishing that owners of a closely held corporation may personally sue the company's attorneys when their financial interests are inseparable from the entity's.
What happened
Steve Sickler and Cathy Mettenbrink built a specialty retail coffee business in Nebraska and decided to franchise it. They hired attorney Jeffrey Orr to handle the legal work, and with Orr's help they formed a corporation, Baristas and Friends, Inc., to serve as the franchise vehicle. Orr drafted franchise disclosure statements that turned out to violate both federal law and Iowa law.
When problems surfaced with the documents, Orr's firm brought in attorney Robert Kirby of Croker, Huck, Kasher, DeWitt, Anderson and Gonderinger, L.L.C. to review them. Kirby identified a long list of compliance failures, but he relayed his findings only to Orr's firm; he never communicated directly with Sickler or Mettenbrink. The defective disclosures led to private litigation and an FTC enforcement action. Their business collapsed.
Sickler and Mettenbrink filed a legal malpractice suit against Kirby and the Croker Huck firm. The defendants argued they owed no duty to the individual owners because they represented only the corporate entity, not the principals personally. The Buffalo County District Court agreed and entered summary judgment for the defendants.
Richard J. Rensch and Sean P. Rensch of Rensch and Rensch Law appealed. They argued that where a corporation is closely held and the owners' personal finances are so intertwined with the entity's that the two cannot be separated, the individual owners are intended third-party beneficiaries of the attorney-client relationship. Under the Nebraska Supreme Court's earlier Perez v. Stern standard, a duty of reasonable care extends to such third parties.
The Nebraska Court of Appeals agreed and reversed summary judgment. The court held that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Sickler and Mettenbrink's financial interests were sufficiently integrated with Baristas and Friends that Kirby owed them a personal duty of care. The ruling remanded the case for further proceedings in district court. Bloomberg Law reported the decision on November 23, 2011, noting that the holding created a pathway for closely held corporation owners to bring personal malpractice claims, a question that had not been squarely addressed under Nebraska law.
Sources
This account is drawn from contemporaneous public reporting and the court record.
More proven verdicts from Rensch and Rensch
All Rensch and Rensch proven verdicts →The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a $34,000 jury verdict for Terry W. Pitt, an Omaha chef who sustained a 20-to-25-percent permanent impairment to his body as a whole after a Checker Cab struck his vehicle while he was making a left turn near 22nd Street and Chandler Road in Bellevue.
The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a post-verdict judgment for the defense and reinstated a $25,000 jury award for a patron beaten at an after-hours Ranch Bowl dance, holding that a venue with three fights per night cannot call a restroom attack unforeseeable.
The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a directed verdict for the defense in Mary Cohan's delayed breast-cancer diagnosis case, ordering a new trial against the radiology and OB/GYN providers responsible for misreading her 2009 mammogram.
The Nebraska Supreme Court upheld a permanent total disability award for a truck driver whose 2009 rollover on an Interstate 680 on-ramp in Omaha combined with pre-existing mental and cognitive impairments left him unable to compete in any regular branch of the labor market.
Related Nebraska verdicts
Billy Moyle, 24, was driving behind a Mack concrete truck on US Highway 75 near Nebraska City on Halloween 2012. The truck moved into the left turn lane and then turned right across his path, running his pickup off the road. He suffered a broken vertebra and a partially severed spinal cord.
On May 5, 2020, Michael L. McCartney was driving a John Deere backhoe across the Indian Creek bridge on U.S. Highway 136 west of Red Cloud, Nebraska, where a construction closure had narrowed the road to one lane and removed a guardrail. A tractor-trailer driven by Lenard D. Zurcher, hauling corn for Scott Kort Trucking, ran into the back of the backhoe, carrying both vehicles into the bridge's concrete barriers and overturning them. McCartney's right leg was amputated below the knee and part of his left foot was also removed. A Webster County jury awarded McCartney $8,464,000 and awarded his wife, Sharon G. McCartney, $3,000,000 for loss of consortium after 49 years of marriage, a combined verdict of $11,464,000. The trial court denied the defendants' motion for a new trial, and the verdict against Zurcher and Scott Kort Trucking was not part of the appeal that followed.
Curt Thege, a BNSF carman at the Havelock Car Shop in Lincoln, was thrown from a scissor lift in June 2019 when an overhead crane hoist moved higher than the operator intended. BNSF admitted it breached its duty of care under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, leaving the jury to decide damages. After a five-day trial the jury returned $9,333,016, and on December 15, 2022 the court entered a $9,295,988.96 judgment after subtracting benefits payments the plaintiff conceded.
Jimmy Rohr Jr., a BNSF carman, was injured in February 2014 at the Havelock Yard in Lincoln when a railcar wheel rolled over his left foot, leading to 13 surgeries and a below-knee amputation. After a trial in January 2019, a Lancaster County jury valued his damages at $7,112,071 under the Federal Employers' Liability Act and assigned him 51 percent of the fault. After that reduction he was left with about $3,485,000, or 49 percent of the verdict.