About Bradley Myers

Bradley J. Myers has represented injury victims for over 17 years. After law school, he spent approximately two years defending the interests of the insurance industry before shifting to plaintiffs' work. He focuses solely on personal injury, covering motor vehicle accidents, insurance bad faith, slip and fall, wrongful death, dog bite, and product liability. Bradley maintains direct communication with clients and does not hesitate to take cases to trial when insurers act unfairly. In 2016, he tried a trip-and-fall staircase case that yielded a jury verdict of $489,988.84, later reduced to a final judgment of $777,345.47.

He holds the highest possible AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He has been selected as one of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers by The National Trial Lawyers and is a member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum. He has also been nominated as a Rising Star by Super Lawyers (Mountain States) and received a Top 10 Attorney Award in 2013 from the National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys. Outside of work, Bradley enjoys traveling and playing music with his local band.

Practice areas

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Nevada

Other attorneys at THE702FIRM Injury Attorneys

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Las Vegas firms

Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers
Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers
$951 million · Utah Judge Awards $951 Million Over Botched Delivery at Steward-Owned Jordan Valley Medical Center
Eglet Law
Eglet Law
$3.8 billion · Real Water Poisoning: $3.8 Billion Verdict in Alkaline Water Liver Failure Cases
GGRM Law Firm
GGRM Law Firm
Nevada Supreme Court Sets Totality-of-Circumstances Test for Law-Enforcement Workers' Comp in GGRM Case
Ladah Law Firm
Ladah Law Firm
$15 Million Wrongful Death Verdict for Family of Man Killed by Speeding Driver in Las Vegas
Richard Harris Personal Injury Law Firm
Richard Harris Personal Injury Law Firm
$38.6 million · A Soldier Shot in an Apartment Parking Lot, and a $38.6 Million Negligent Security Verdict

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.