About Samantha Smith

Samantha Smith focuses her practice on asbestos litigation and bankruptcy, helping victims diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other related cancers. Her motivation is deeply personal, having seen her own family work in the same industries as her clients. She earned a B.A. in Speech Communications from the University of Illinois in 1994 and a J.D. from South Texas College of Law in 1998. She was named to the Super Lawyers Rising Stars list in 2008 and recognized among Texas Monthly's Top Young Attorneys in Texas in 2008. She is also a longtime supporter of local animal rescue organizations.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Williams Hart & Boundas

These results are credited to Williams Hart & Boundas. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

John Eddie Williams, Jr. served as one of five private attorneys retained by the State of Texas to sue the major tobacco companies, producing a $15.3 billion settlement in January 1998, the largest single-case settlement in U.S. history at the time.

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Texarkana) · 1998Class ActionsRead the full story →
$46.5 millionVerdictTop 20 of 2016 · #11

A St. Louis jury awarded $46.5 million to three plaintiffs who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma after PCB exposure, delivering the first plaintiff verdict of its kind against Monsanto in the city.

Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri (Benito Walker, et al. v. Monsanto Company, et al., Case No. 1122-CC09621-01) · 2016Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$38 millionVerdictTop 20 of 2015 · #9

A St. Louis jury returned a $38 million verdict against Abbott Laboratories for failing to adequately warn patients and physicians that Depakote, taken during pregnancy to control epilepsy, could cause severe birth defects including spina bifida.

Missouri Circuit Court, City of St. Louis (Barron v. Abbott, Case No. 1222-CC-0247901; affirmed Missouri Supreme Court No. SC96151, 2017) · 2015Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$15 millionVerdict

A federal jury in East St. Louis found in June 2017 that Abbott Laboratories failed to warn a prescribing doctor about the risk of severe birth defects from Depakote. It awarded $15 million in compensatory damages to a 10-year-old boy born with spina bifida after his mother took the drug during pregnancy. The jury declined to award punitive damages.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis · 2017Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$12.45 millionVerdict

Jim Hart won a $12.45 million jury verdict for a Houston couple severely injured when a New Prime tractor-trailer rear-ended their sedan on I-45, though the Texas Supreme Court later reversed on procedural grounds and remanded for a new trial.

129th District Court of Harris County, Texas (Alonzo v. John, No. 14-20-00148-CV, affirmed Fourteenth Court of Appeals March 29, 2022) · 2019Truck AccidentsRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

South Texas College of Law
J.D., 1998
University of Illinois
Undergraduate, 1994

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Texas

Other attorneys at Williams Hart & Boundas

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Houston firms

The Lanier Law Firm
The Lanier Law Firm
$4.85 Billion Vioxx MDL Settlement for Heart-Attack and Stroke Victims
The Buzbee Law Firm
The Buzbee Law Firm
$1.1 Billion Verdict for Child Left Brain-Damaged by Oil-Fortune Heir
Arnold & Itkin
Arnold & Itkin
$2.07 billion · Cobb County Jury Awards John Barnes $2.065 Billion in Roundup Cancer Trial
The Ammons Law Firm LLP
The Ammons Law Firm LLP
$812 Million Verdict for Family of Worker Killed in Pecos Chemical Plant Explosion, Part of $1.6 Billion
Abraham Watkins
Abraham Watkins
$28.59 million · Jury Finds ExxonMobil 100% Liable for Baytown Plant Explosion, Awards Five Workers $28.59 Million

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.