About Meredith Harbison

Meredith A. Harbison graduated summa cum laude from the Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville in 2022, where she served as Senior Symposium Editor and Executive Editor of the University of Louisville Law Review. She published a note in Volume 60 of that journal titled "Emerging Mental Health Courts: The Intersection of Mental Illness, Substance Abuse, Poverty, and Incarceration." She is admitted to practice in Virginia and Kentucky, as well as before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia.

Her background includes clerkships focused on civil rights, employment discrimination, and education law, along with experience at the Kentucky Commission on Human Rights and Kentucky Legal Aid. She received the Leon Siedman Award for Outstanding Commitment to Law and Public Service and multiple CALI Awards for academic excellence. She practices at the firm's Richmond office.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Breit Biniazan

These results are credited to Breit Biniazan. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

A Richmond Circuit Court jury awarded $360 million to three former adolescent patients who were sexually abused by Dr. Daniel Davidow, the medical director of Cumberland Hospital for Children, during what he called routine femoral pulse exams.

Richmond Circuit Court, Virginia · 2024Premises LiabilityRead the full story →
$20 millionVerdictTop 20 in Virginia · #5

A Charles City County jury returned a $20 million verdict for a ten-year-old boy who suffered third-degree burns across 25 percent of his body after contacting 13,200 volts inside an inadequately secured Virginia Power substation next to his Richmond apartment complex, and the Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the award in full.

Supreme Court of Virginia (affirming trial verdict) · 1999Premises LiabilityRead the full story →
$17.61 millionSettlementTop 20 in Virginia · #6

Nine boys abused by a Colonial Heights church youth leader secured a $17.61 million global settlement in July 2025, wrapping up nearly nine years of civil litigation and paying out four times what the defendants' insurers claimed they owed.

Colonial Heights, Virginia · 2025Premises LiabilityRead the full story →
$15 millionVerdictTop 20 in Virginia · #7

A Charlottesville jury awarded $15 million in May 2022 to the mother and sister of Yeardley Love, a University of Virginia lacrosse player killed by her former boyfriend in 2010, more than a decade after his criminal conviction.

Charlottesville Circuit Court, Virginia · 2022Wrongful DeathRead the full story →
$11.5 millionSettlementTop 20 in Virginia · #9

A federal judge approved an $11.5 million settlement for a Virginia Beach Navy family whose son was born with severe brain damage at U.S. Naval Hospital Guam in 2014, after attorneys Michael Imprevento and Kevin Biniazan sued the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

U.S. District Court (Eastern District of Virginia) · 2019Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Brandeis School of Law, University of Louisville
J.D., 2022

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Virginia, admitted 2022
State Bar of Kentucky

Other attorneys at Breit Biniazan

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Richmond firms

Emroch & Kilduff
Emroch & Kilduff
$9 Million Settlement for Truck Driver Who Lost His Right Leg When a Wheelabrator Truck Ran a Stop Sign
Marks & Harrison
Marks & Harrison
$10 million · Runaway Norfolk Southern Boxcar Crushes a Richmond Floodwall Worker: $10 Million Verdict
Geoff McDonald & Associates, P.C.
Geoff McDonald & Associates, P.C.
$40.5 million · Banner Life and William Penn Policyholders: A $40.5 Million Class Settlement Over Premium Spikes
Allen Allen Allen & Allen
Allen Allen Allen & Allen
$25 Million Verdict Against Cardiologist Who Read Blocked Arteries as Normal

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.