Alicia Smith

Attorney at Farah & Farah
Orlando, FL10 years experience

About Alicia Smith

Alicia Marie Smith is a Premises Liability Attorney at Farah & Farah's Orlando, Florida office, where she focuses on cases involving serious, life-changing injuries caused by unsafe property conditions. Over the past four years on the plaintiffs' side, she has recovered more than $80 million in verdicts and settlements for her clients, earning the nickname 'Honey Badger' from colleagues for her relentless trial approach.

Before representing injured clients, Smith built her foundation across multiple roles — felony division legal intern with the Public Defender's Office, certified legal intern with the State Attorney's Office, law clerk for a Florida insurance defense firm, and civil litigation associate at a statewide trial defense firm where she defended Fortune 500 companies and insurance carriers in premises and professional liability matters.

Smith earned her B.A. in Political Science (Pre-Law) from the University of Central Florida and her J.D. from Florida State University College of Law (Class of 2015). She is admitted to The Florida Bar (#117607). She was featured in The Florida Bar's 'On the Move' section in the November 1, 2025 newsletter and in the FSU Law Class Notes upon joining Farah & Farah's Orlando office.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Farah & Farah

These results are credited to Farah & Farah. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$27.01 millionVerdictTop 20 of 2014 · #14

A federal jury in Jacksonville found for Judith Berger, a forty-year smoker with end-stage COPD, on all claims against Philip Morris USA in September 2014. It awarded $6,250,000 in compensatory damages and $20,760,000.14 in punitive damages. The trial court set aside the fraud claims and the punitive award, but the Eleventh Circuit reinstated them in 2018 and held in 2021 that the punitive award was not unconstitutionally excessive.

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division (No. 3:09-cv-14157) · 2014Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$5.9 millionVerdict

A federal jury in Jacksonville found that cigarettes made by R.J. Reynolds were a legal cause of a Florida man's death from lung cancer in 1996. It awarded his widow $5.9 million in compensatory damages and assigned 27.5 percent of the fault to him, which produced a judgment of $4,277,500. In October 2014 the Eleventh Circuit reversed over the exclusion of evidence of his alcohol use and remanded for a new trial, and the case settled on undisclosed terms in January 2015 before any retrial.

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville · 2013Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$730,000Verdict

A Duval County jury returned a $1.83 million verdict against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco in the wrongful-death claim of Kenneth Hiott, a longtime smoker who died of lung cancer; the trial court reduced the award to $730,000 based on comparative fault, and Florida's First District Court of Appeal affirmed in January 2014.

Duval County Circuit Court, Jacksonville, FL · 2012Wrongful DeathRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Florida State University College of Law
B.A. Political Science (Pre-Law), 2015
University of Central Florida
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Florida (Bar No. 117607)
The Florida Bar

Other attorneys at Farah & Farah

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Orlando firms

Morgan & Morgan
Morgan & Morgan
$644.75 million · Orange County Jury Awards $644.75 Million to Man Left Partially Paralyzed by Winter Park Bar Staircase Fall
Wooten Kimbrough Damaso & Dennis
Wooten Kimbrough Damaso & Dennis
$5.2 Million Verdict for Tow Truck Driver Burned by Battery Acid in I-75 Spill
Colling Gilbert Wright
Colling Gilbert Wright
$1.08 Million Verdict for Widow of WWII-Era Smoker Who Died of RJR-Caused Lung Cancer

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.