Similar personal injury attorneys in Cincinnati
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Anne Gilday
Anne L. Gilday is an attorney at Lawrence, Beirne & Lewis and a Cincinnati native who joined the firm following her law school clerkship there. She has successfully represented clients in cases involving medical negligence, personal injury, nursing home issues, and defective products. Ms. Gilday currently serves as a Board Member of the Ohio Association for Justice and as an Officer of the Southwest Ohio Trial Lawyers Association. She has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2013 through 2018 and as a Kentucky and Ohio Super Lawyer from 2020 through 2022. She holds bar admissions in Ohio, Kentucky, and multiple federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Lawrence, Beirne & Lewis
These results are credited to Lawrence, Beirne & Lewis. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Montgomery County jury awarded the Stanziano family $30,953,181 in July 2009 after finding Miami Valley Hospital negligent in a birth injury case, reportedly the largest medical malpractice verdict in Ohio at the time. The parties then reached a confidential settlement before the punitive damages phase, so the amount actually paid was less than the verdict.
A Clermont County, Ohio jury found that an emergency room doctor was negligent for failing to instruct the parents of a nine-year-old boy on how to watch for a serious head injury after a fall, a lapse that let an epidural hematoma go undetected overnight and required emergency brain surgery. The jury awarded $2,412,899 in 2010, which the trial court reduced by a $500,000 credit for the family's earlier settlement with the hospital, leaving the doctor and his practice group liable for $1,912,899 plus prejudgment interest. The Twelfth District Court of Appeals affirmed the verdict in 2012, and the Ohio Supreme Court resolved a separate dispute over how the interest should be calculated in 2013, sending that narrow issue back to the trial court. The underlying negligence finding and damages figure were never disturbed.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
