Similar personal injury attorneys in Sacramento
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Christopher Romero
Christopher G. Romero grew up in Sacramento and attended Jesuit High School before earning both his Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy and his Juris Doctor at Santa Clara University on a full-tuition Ignatian Scholarship. He completed an internship at the Sacramento District Attorney's office, clerked at Caltrans Legal Division, and worked as a clerk at Wilcoxen Callaham before joining as an attorney. He was admitted to the California bar in 2016. Since joining the firm he has maintained a full caseload of state and federal personal injury and medical malpractice matters, obtaining numerous six- and seven-figure settlements. He has extensive trial, arbitration, and appellate experience, including authoring the respondent's brief in Brewer v. Remington (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 14, successfully argued before the Fifth Appellate District on statute of limitations issues for healthcare providers.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Wilcoxen Callaham
These results are credited to Wilcoxen Callaham. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Butte County jury found Enloe Medical Center negligent in the 2009 death of Todd Stewart, who died from internal bleeding after complications arose during a recalled defibrillator removal procedure.
William Callaham won a $2.5 million jury verdict for the parents of a 13-day-old premature infant who died of necrotizing enterocolitis after a nurse practitioner discharged her from the emergency room without a full workup; California's MICRA cap reduced the family's recovery to roughly $255,000.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Wilcoxen Callaham
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Sacramento firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









